• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Entitlement Crisis: At Least Congress Is Still Paying Attention

    While the President’s FY2013 budget ignores the looming crisis of entitlement spending, the House and Senate Budget Committees, to their credit, are keeping their eyes on the ball this week with hearings on the three largest threats to the country’s economic health: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. These hearings usefully keep attention focused on the urgency of the problem and will be even more valuable if they lead to proposals for real solutions.

    Naturally, such events invite a bit of political theatrics, as Members on each side critique reform proposals from the other. But that should not overshadow the very real and difficult entitlement challenges these hearings describe.

    The problem truly is serious. By mid-century, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security together will swallow up more than 18 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)—eclipsing the average historical level of federal tax revenue. That means all other government activities, including such vital ones as national defense, will have to go begging for borrowed money. This of course will add to the economic drag of extended deficits and debt. Therefore, gaining control of entitlement spending is indispensable to the country’s fiscal and economic health.

     

    Demographics are destiny. It is well known that the problem is driven in large part by a fundamental shift in the U.S. population that will take hold during the next two decades. Stephen C. Goss, chief actuary of the Social Security Administration, describes the effect as follows:

    All else equal, we will have one-third fewer working-age people for every elder in the future. This shift started around 2010 and will be complete around 2030. Even with projected increases in employment of our older population, the number of workers for each Social Security and Medicare beneficiary will drop from three to two over the next 20 years.

    Government bears a large part of the blame. Government has become an increasingly dominant consumer of health care, accounting for nearly half of all national medical spending by 2010—compared with slightly more than one-third in 1976—according to Richard S. Foster, chief actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid alone account for about 35 percent of national health expenditures. When government plays such a large role in a market, the market is sure to be distorted. That raises costs for private insurance as well.

    Moreover, Medicare’s benefits and payment systems aggravate the problem. James C. Capretta of the Ethics and Public Policy Center notes the combination of Medicare fee-for-service and Medigap policies provides most beneficiaries with 100 percent coverage of services, creating inefficiencies:

    This kind of first-dollar coverage provides a powerful incentive for additional use of services. Whole segments of the U.S. medical industry have been built around the incentives embedded in these arrangements. Moreover, all of the various providers of services have their own Medicare fee schedule, and can bill the program separately from all others when they render services to Medicare patients.

    In short, more government control is not the answer. Instead, patients need a more consumer-oriented, market-based approach.

    Obamacare will make matters worse. Its insurance subsidies, exchanges, and other components will add $645 billion to government health spending between now and 2022. In addition to all its other intrusions into Americans’ lives, the program will accelerate the government takeover of the health care market.

    Reform is the only salvation. Those who claim to protect these entitlements by inaction only ensure their demise. Social Security already is running a cash deficit. Medicare spending alone is projected to exceed $1 trillion by 2022, nearly twice its current spending level. Medicaid, too, will more than double in cost by 2022, to $605 billion. The only way to ensure health and retirement security for Americans in the future is by restructuring these programs.

    The Budget Committee hearings this week help refocus attention on the unyielding challenge of entitlement spending. Congress should follow up by pursuing real reforms. Even if they cannot be enacted soon, such proposals can build the foundation for necessary reforms in the future.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to The Entitlement Crisis: At Least Congress Is Still Paying Attention

    1. Bobbie says:

      100% of the blame goes to government. The role of government was to oversee any consumer discrepancies and correct any problems conflicting to the contract signed. The government capitalized on the consumer discrepancies by the failure of government to correct whatever problems there were? but rather use the government failure against the insurance companies to spin government into full control! All employees whose employer offers health insurance are equally offered the same. Many employees chose not to do with less their paycheck to cover their personal costs of health care which added to this illusion while the rest of us continue to pay but at a higher price for health insurance that has become no more than a cost burden over the intent of providing quality service and quality coverage!

      1st step: Reform all entitlements to reflect social security, medicare ONLY and the one necessary qualification being elderly! It's dangerous the government helped themselves into this! Americans that don't know better, are going to have to look to each other for their own personal resources or ask a fellow American that isn't a government tool, that does know.

    2. StopGuardianAbuse says:

      There is a problem feeding into the Medicaid crisis which Congress can stop, but doesn't seem to want to.
      Learn why:
      "Fleecing Medicaid and the Taxpayers" http://www.AnOpenLetterToCongress-3.info

    3. Chris says:

      I contributed to S/S for forty years and I don't like it being called an Entitlement!!!!!!! Welfare for Americans and illegal's are entitlements!!!!!!!!

      • Bobbie says:

        I respect that. I've paid in for years myself and surely won't see a dime. Your comment opens the hidden truth once again. The majority of people receiving these prepaid benefits by people told to expect them that the government classifies as "entitlements" aren't the deserving many that pay but are the ones the government entitles which is defined in your comment and why the government ignores anyone rightfully insulted by the term. Americans are getting nothing for their money while the government entitled get everything without cost, earn or effort accept to apply…

      • Todd says:

        Chris,

        When the current cost of living combined with the affects of all the inflation that occured over your lifetime eats up all of your pre-inflation SS contributions after the first five to ten years of your retirement and you start receiving money you didn't contribute to the system, will it be an entitlement then?

    4. Caregvr says:

      First lets get the meaning of entitlement correct. Social Security and Medicare are entitlement programs.
      Section 8 housing, WIC, Free Telephones, Free Utilities, Free Food, Free School breakfast, lunch and dinner plus snacks, disability to drug addicts who have selected to abuse their bodies are NOT ENTITLEMENT!!
      These people have never worked for what they get. I am not singling anyone out, but if you get rather than pay your own way then you are not entitled!! I paid and I am entitled to draw Social Security!! And because of the non-entitlement programs, I continue to work even in retirement to help support those who don't help themselves. I am not talking about people who, because of bad luck, are in need. I am talking about those who choose not to work

    5. Caregvr says:

      If the government had left all the money paid into Social Security Trust Fund in the fund then money would be there for all retirees to enjoy and the government would not have to be complaining about what they call "Entitlements" which are really non-entitlements. Instead they choose to put all monies paid into SS into the general fund to be raped and pillaged by the Government Thieves!! We wouldn't have to worry about 10 years down the road!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×