• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama - For Keystone or Against It?

    The Obama Administration voiced its support Monday regarding TransCanada Corporation’s plans to construct the interstate portion of the Keystone XL pipeline that does not require presidential approval. Remember that President Obama rejected TransCanada’s permit application to construct a 1,700-mile pipeline from Alberta, Canada, to Texas refineries just this January. Has the President since had a change of heart on the Keystone project? Not really.

    Since the 485-mile segment of the pipeline from Oklahoma to Texas can be carried out without presidential approval, the President’s endorsement is utterly meaningless. President Obama earns no credit for the economic boost and jobs impact that this $2.3 billion project, expected to create 4,000 jobs, will have on America. Nevertheless, President Obama will likely claim credit for it. As the President has demonstrated in the recent past, he has no qualms about claiming credit for energy developments that happened in spite of his policies, not because of them.

    Proponents and opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline alike are angered by the President’s apparent Keystone flip flop. Environmental activists want the whole pipeline project scrapped, and House Speaker John Boehner (R–OH) said:

    The President is so far on the wrong side of the American people that he’s now praising the company’s decision to start going around him.… [The President] can’t have it both ways. If the President thinks this project is good for America, he knows how to make it happen right away. Until he does, he’s just standing in the way of getting it done.

    TransCanada’s plans are good news for America. The company will proceed with building the interstate portion of the pipeline pending regulatory approval. At the same time, TransCanada is working with Nebraska officials to find a reroute around the contentious Sandhills region affecting that portion of the pipeline.

    TransCanada is also applying for a new permit with the State Department to complete the full project. In the meantime, the portion from the storage hub in Cushing, Oklahoma, to oil refineries in Texas would allow much more oil to be refined more quickly, which could put downward pressure on all-time-high gas prices.

    Nevertheless, the good news should not detract from the thousands of missing jobs and hundreds of thousands of barrels of additional oil President Obama’s unnecessary rejection of the cross-border portion from the U.S. to Canada is causing.

    Click here to view this post in Spanish at Libertad.org.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Obama - For Keystone or Against It?

    1. Jeff, Illinois says:

      There are a host of reasons to not go forward with the XL pipeline . . just do a little research. Get off this topic already! Stop demagoguing / propagandizing this issue just to make some distorted point that the present administration doesn't have our nation's best interests in mind. So childish and troubling to continue to play on the fears of the less informed. Stop already!

      • Bobbie says:

        with more a host of reasons to go forward! what are the present administrations interests when they are working against the will of the people and against the President's own words regarding America's energy independence? There's only dangerously ignorant people like you to fear, Jeff!

    2. Domenic Stagno says:

      Apparently Ms Boccia doesn't understand all the complex factors that need to be considered for Keystone Project. It would be very easy to just rubber stamp the project and get more votes. Obama, also happens to care about the environment and the long term survival of the American people. Apparently Ms Boccia lives in a very easy, back and white world that doesn;t require RESPONSIBILITY AND THINKING!!!
      There were serious concerns about the very dirty tar sands, leaking fro the pipeline and destroying our precious farm land and water. without these we would not survive!!!
      Instead of giving credit to a president who cares about the whole package, he is vilified by people like Ms Boccia and Romney and Ryan and is ridiculed as stupid and anti-American and not wanting to do the right thing. He is pushing back against Keystone to insist that they guarantee more safety on the project and that it will benefit Americans as much as Canadians.
      Oh, did Ms Boccia happen to mention that the Keystone Proposal that Obama rejected would benefit Canada more tha the US . Obama is doing his job. he wants the company to do more on safety and provide more for the US before he approves it. Instead of thanking him for that we criticize him unfairly!!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×