- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Thousands More Oppose Obamacare Mandate's Religious Liberty Violations
Posted By Sarah Torre On February 24, 2012 @ 3:56 pm In Featured,Obamacare | Comments Disabled
More than 2,500 Christian leaders have signed a letter opposing Obamcare’s anti-conscience mandate. The letter’s release adds to the most recent furor over the rule’s blatant violation of religious liberty and decries the mandate’s coercion of religious employers to subsidize abortion-inducing drugs, contraceptives, and sterilization regardless of moral or religious objections to such services.
The letter , sponsored by the Family Research Council, explains:
Our country was founded on certain freedoms, the first of which is the freedom of religion. The ability of a religious person to follow their conscience without fearing government intervention has long been a protected right for Americans. It is unfathomable to picture a country that would deny religious freedoms.
The letter takes issue with the mandate’s offensively narrow religious exemption that affords a protection of religious liberty only to formal houses of worship—excluding may religious employers like hospitals, schools, and social service organizations. Perhaps most insulting is the Administration’s insinuation that religious belief is merely a private affair that should stay locked behind church doors.
As Richard Land, signatory of the letter and president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, explained  at a press conference announcing the release of the letter: “[The mandate] is part of an attempt to atrophy, to nullify, to confine and constrain, and to emasculate and neuter religious freedom down to freedom of worship.”
Increasing attempts to privatize religion, relegating faith to worship services and personal thoughts, disregard the important role faith plays in public life and ignores the work that many faith-based institutions do in sustaining civil society. “What our forefathers protected is freedom of conscience, freedom of religion,” Land continued . “That is—the freedom to propagate our faith, to take our faith outside the walls of our home, outside the walls of our church.”
A narrowing view of religion that refuses to protect faith-based organizations’ ability to act in accordance with deeply held beliefs—the same beliefs that spur them to action in the first place—undermines a robust protection of religious liberty.
As Heritage’s Ryan Messmore writes :
Religious freedom is not just for churches. For many individuals and organizations, losing the ability to abide by their religious convictions in carrying out their work imperils their religious identity. It also threatens the effectiveness of their work and the services they provide for those in need. A more comprehensive, robust conception of religion is an important anchor for vigorous, wide-ranging religious freedom—freedom not merely to believe or teach certain doctrines, but to live out one’s faith in all aspects of life.
The letter’s 2,500 signatories join an ever-expanding list of individuals and organizations from diverse faith backgrounds  who have denounced the mandate’s assault on religious liberty. Just this week, the Alliance Defense Fund filed two lawsuits  against the Obama Administration on behalf of Geneva College, a small Pennsylvania school affiliated with the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America, and Louisiana College, a Southern Baptist school.
Despite the assertions  of some pundits and politicians who herald the mandate as supporting “women’s health,” many women have also voiced opposition to the rule’s serious infringement of religious freedom.
Helen Alvaré, associate professor of law at George Mason University, and Kim Daniels, former counsel at the Thomas More Law Center, also released a letter  this week signed by more than 750 women in opposition to the anti-conscience mandate. The letter’s bipartisan signatories are as diverse as they are numerous, including businesswomen, writers, lawyers, professors, nurses, teachers, and many others.
“No one speaks for all women on these issues,” the letter states. “Those who purport to do so are simply attempting to deflect attention from the serious religious liberty issues currently at stake.”
On February 27, Heritage will host Women Speak Out: Obamacare Tramples on Religious Liberty . A panel of women will discuss how religious freedom is an early casualty in Obamacare’s collision course with freedom and why protecting religious liberty, specifically, and individual freedom, generally, requires the repeal of Obamacare .
Join us Monday at 2 p.m. (EST) for the event or watch it live online .
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/24/thousands-more-oppose-obamacare-mandates-religious-liberty-violations/
URLs in this post:
 letter: https://www.frc.org/get.cfm?c=CHECKOUT&dmy=B1011C7A-A3DB-F200-4399DB25E5F1ED72&CFID=13694778&CFTOKEN=48a3f80fb87d41ab-B1011B7E-9DF5-A766-4BFECE29AB854F85
 explained: http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/BPnews.asp?ID=37220
 writes: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/10/religious-freedom-and-liberty-is-not-just-for-churches
 diverse faith backgrounds: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/06/many-faiths-unite-in-opposition-to-obama-attack-on-religious-liberty/
 filed two lawsuits: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/21/two-more-religious-liberty-lawsuits-filed-against-obamacare/
 assertions: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/18/the-war-on-womens-freedom/
 letter: http://womenspeakforthemselves.com/
 Women Speak Out: Obamacare Tramples on Religious Liberty: http://www.heritage.org/events/2012/02/women-on-obamacare
 requires the repeal of Obamacare: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/14/how-conscience-gets-trapped-in-obamacares-little-box-of-horrors/
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.