• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama Doctrine Leaves World Less Safe

    In his State of the Union address, President Obama declared that “America is back.” Examining Obama’s foreign policy efforts, however, this statement seems doubtful. To better understand Obama’s foreign policy, Heritage hosted a panel discussion with Kim Holmes, Mark Thiessen, and Clifford May.

    As Holmes has previously written, Obama defines America as just another nation with no particular claim to greatness or exceptional responsibilities. As such, his foreign policy downplays the U.S. leadership role, defers to international organizations, and focuses on soft power strategies. Paying particular attention to the Arab Spring, counterterrorism, and the defense budget, the panel discussed how the Obama doctrine has created inconsistent policies and ignored long-term concerns.

    In avoiding a leadership role, U.S. actions in the Middle East have become erratic. In Iran, America first tried conciliatory efforts; now, it is taking a harsher tone. In response to the Arab Spring, the U.S. has done nothing in Syria, sent troops into Libya, and made speeches about Egypt. There is no clear humanitarian, economic, or strategic rationale governing American actions. Instead, the Obama doctrine waits on the U.N. before making a stand for freedom and democracy.

    Obama’s biggest success—the Osama bin Laden mission—was based on intelligence gathered under the Bush Administration. But Obama is failing to gather new intelligence that could be vital to the safety of American citizens in the future. He has chosen to kill terrorists rather than capture and interrogate them, because his policies do not include a long term counterterrorism strategy. Indeed, the U.S. often lets captured terrorist go because there is nowhere to hold them. By failing to build up intelligence information and pursuing a terrorist “catch and release” policy, the Administration is leaving the U.S. and its allies vulnerable to attack.

    Finally, the new defense budget clearly demonstrates a lack of commitment to America’s long-term strength. Under the Obama doctrine’s assumption that international organizations and soft power strategies will fill the security gap, the Administration is attempting to reduce the overall capacity of the U.S. military. The problem, of course, is that hostile powers such as China, Iran, and Russia are all too willing, and increasingly capable, to fill the gap themselves.

    After three years of the Obama doctrine, it is clear that America is not, in fact, “back.” Instead, America’s ability to champion freedom and promote stability has been continually damaged, creating a more dangerous world for all.

    Caitlin Kincaid is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Obama Doctrine Leaves World Less Safe

    1. We know that Obama has said that he wants to "fundamentally change America" but his wholesale disarming us is beyond the pale. On the Job training for a President is a bad idea, as his tenure has shown. Hopefully he will not be re-elected and the damage can be undone.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×