• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Iran’s Clandestine Operations Threaten Azerbaijan

    On February 21, Azerbaijani counterintelligence services arrested Iranian agents planning terrorist attacks against Israeli diplomats and prominent members of the Jewish community. This is the second such cell being intercepted since the beginning of the year.

    This is a part of Iran’s shadow war against Israel conducted from New Delhi to Tbilisi, Georgia. Some say the attacks are a tit-for-tat for the alleged Israeli operations against Iranian nuclear scientists working on Tehran’s nuclear program. But there is more.

    Arrests of Iranian agents in Azerbaijan indicate the heightened level of Tehran’s terrorist activity aimed at the oil-rich Caucasus state. Relations between Baku and Tehran in recent years have been steadily deteriorating, mainly due to developing ties between Azerbaijan and the U.S./NATO.

    The Iranian pressure against Baku warrants a firmer response by the U.S. and the West.

    Geopolitical tension is running high in the Middle East as the U.S. and Europe step up sanctions designed to starve Iran’s oil revenue stream. The sanctions’ aim is to force Iran to give up enriching uranium. It is a consensus among nuclear experts that Iran’s program is not designed as a peaceful civic project, as its government asserts.

    In addition to the sanctions, Iran wages a shadow war against Israel—and now increasingly against pro-Western Azerbaijan, which is located on the land-locked Caspian Sea in the Caucasus. Tehran recently conducted operations against Israeli targets in Tbilisi, New Delhi, and Bangkok.

    An article in the Times of London last week reported that the Mossad is engaged in clandestine activities in Azerbaijan. The article enraged the Iranian foreign ministry, which accused Baku of exfiltrating Israeli agents after the assassination of an Iranian nuclear scientist. These claims were baseless.

    In the face of Iranian threats, Azerbaijan is seeking good relations with the West. Ilham Aliyev, the president of Azerbaijan, visited NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen on February 15. Following the meeting, the two parties issued a joint statement describing the stronger ties that Azerbaijan wants to form with NATO.

    In the most recent attempt at covert action, weapons for the murder squad were smuggled into the country under the direct supervision of Iran’s intelligence services. Preparations for this attack—down to photos, names, and exact details of the Israeli targets in Baku—were meticulously prepared weeks before the Iranian–Hezbollah operation in Georgia.

    Arastun Orujlu, the head of East–West Institute, an independent Baku-based think tank, puts Iran’s aims in perspective: “Iran tries to provoke Israel. Iran needs an external factor to mobilize and unite the society, but it realizes that it will lose a big war. That is why Iran is trying to provoke Israel to engage in smaller-scale confrontation.”

    In addition to Azerbaijan’s foreign policy priorities, Iran’s has a problem with the Baku’s secular nature. This is not surprising, as millions of ethnic Azeris live in Iran, and may want a freer life, like their brethren in Azerbaijan.

    Iran attempts to undermine secular Azerbaijan by beaming Shia Islamist propaganda broadcasts and supporting radical organizations, especially in Azerbaijan’s south. Unsurprisingly, the government in Baku is guarding against radical Shiite organizations that may try to gain political power. The Hezbollah model is not for Azerbaijan.

    Azerbaijan is already a key strategic partner for the West, but common interests lead to expanding ties. A closer partnership would result in increased oil and gas supply from the Caspian basin. This would assist European energy diversification and allow Central Asian energy resources to flow west via Azerbaijan.

    The U.S. should boost cooperation with Baku, including counterterrorism, intelligence cooperation, and border security improvements. The Obama Administration should take the lead and encourage Europe and Turkey to do the same. There is also room for expansion in exchange programs for scholars, students, experts, and journalists, which Baku welcomes.

    It is high time to appoint a new, high-profile U.S. ambassador to Baku after Matthew J. Bryza’s recess appointment has expired. It is time to engage Azerbaijan as a true strategic partner in the region rather than a supply outpost for Afghanistan or an alternative “gas station” beyond the Persian Gulf. Azerbaijan will be having a huge impact on how the conflict with Iran will develop, but more importantly, it is and should remain a long-term friend of the U.S.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Iran’s Clandestine Operations Threaten Azerbaijan

    1. Mason says:

      Don't worry Mr Cohen Azerbaijan we will annex Azerbaijan to Iran very soon .

    2. Mason says:

      I posted comment what happened, you know Azerbaijan will eventually will become part of Iran.Azerbaijan govrerment is not very stable and in case of a war it will be overthrown.

      • Guest says:

        this is exactly type of thinking that makes average Azerbaijani to dislike Iran. Not only you dream of annexing secular, but predominantly muslim Azerbaijan but in fact you are also heavily supporting another invador into Azerbaijan -e.g Armenia. Instead of dreaming of Azerbaijani territories you shall think of being able to defend your own country from potential and probable attack from Israel and US. Bottom line – you are bad neighbour, you are bad muslim and you have no moral authority to be a leader in this region as long as you continue to pursue policy based on disrespect and double standards.

    3. Quinterius says:

      This article is silly. In fact, Mossad and CIA agents are operating out of Azerbaijan to make trouble in Iran. The assassins of the Iranian nuclear scientist entered from Azerbaijan and escaped to that country after committing their crimes.

    4. @kafantaris2 says:

      Iran faces a delicate issue. On the one hand it wants to show the world all it’s got and put it at ease, while on the other hand it fears that such show 'n tell will give its enemies a roadmap to bomb it.
      Saddam Hussein faced a similar dilemma ten years ago. Though he wanted the world to know he had nothing to hide, he also wanted to bluff his archenemy Iran into believing Iraq still had WMD.
      Bluffing did not go well for Saddam, and it might not go well for Ahmadinejad.
      But since the price tag for ridding Saddam proved high, maybe we ought to reflect what we are asking of Iran now. On the eve of a threatened attack, we are asking it to take us to the depths of its arsenal and show us all it's got.
      Such great expectations are a sign we have been talking to our friends too long and are in need of a broader perspective. Exactly when was the last time we asked Pakistan, India, China or Russia to show us their arsenal?
      “But those countries are not advocating the destruction of Israel.”
      True, but Israel is not a thorn on their side either.
      Surely, however, we can see beyond the hyperboles and figure out their underlying purpose. Or have we forgotten that not all Iranians are thrilled with Ahmadinejad?
      He sure hasn’t forgotten.
      Nor has he forgotten that that his countrymen hate Israel even more. So he tells them that Israel will be wiped from the face of the earth. Expectantly, this nonsense unites them against a common enemy. It is even a diversion from the misery and isolation brought on by his theocratic regime.
      Quite clever work by Ahmadinejad — and not a rial spent or a bullet fired.
      So why are we letting the crazy talk about destroying Israel get us all worked-up — to the point of turning the world topsy-turvy again.
      Can we not see the desperate attempts of an unpopular regime simply trying to hold on?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.