- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

"Hollow Forces" Discussion Distracts from Consequences of Defense Cuts

Posted By Brian Slattery On February 23, 2012 @ 3:00 pm In Security | Comments Disabled

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) recently issued a report [1] that attempts to explain the usage of the term “hollow forces.”

The report argues that given the context of the term, it cannot be used to describe dramatic cuts befalling the U.S. military today. Proponents of shrinking America’s armed forces have leapt on this report, misusing it to argue that warnings of a weakened national security are ill-founded.

Numerous defense experts [2] have decried anti-defense advocates for diluting the real issue. James Jay Carafano of The Heritage Foundation comments, “Although the report may be technically correct that the military won’t go hollow as it did in the 1970s, it’s interesting but irrelevant.”

President Obama’s fiscal year 2013 budget request will cause America’s military to fall short of even his own Administration’s strategic guidance directive [3]. The document indicates a shift to the Asia-Pacific region, yet the budget request dramatically cuts funding for shipbuilding and fighter jets [4]. Whether you call this a “hollow force,” a loss of readiness, or a reduction in capability, the fact remains that the military will be less prepared [5] in the future to handle security threats.

The CRS report, moreover, does not account for sequestration. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has made it clear that if these across-the-board cuts go into effect, the consequences would be severe [6]. While the CRS authors perhaps prudently did not account for this, lawmakers cannot ignore the potential cuts. House Armed Services Committee chairman Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R–CA) recently conceded that the first round of defense cuts is essentially irreversible [7] and that Congress should now strive to reverse cuts [8] brought on by the sequestration.

As defense expert Mackenzie Eaglen recently argued [9], “A high operational tempo over the past decade has put an incredible strain upon all of America’s military.” Perhaps one cannot literally call this the phenomenon of a “hollow force,” but reckless defense cuts weaken America’s national security forces and put its citizens unnecessarily at risk.


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/23/hollow-forces-discussion-distracts-from-consequences-of-defense-cuts/

URLs in this post:

[1] report: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42334.pdf

[2] Numerous defense experts: http://freebeacon.com/hollow-research/print/

[3] strategic guidance directive: http://www.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf

[4] shipbuilding and fighter jets: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/02/fix-the-top-5-military-modernization-mistakes

[5] less prepared: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/02/defense-budget-senate-initiative-to-block-blow-to-military-readiness

[6] consequences would be severe: http://www.politico.com/static/PPM205_11_14_11_panetta_respsonse_to_mccain_graham_ltr.html

[7] first round of defense cuts is essentially irreversible: http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/files/uploads/images/20120217-FPI-Defending%20Defense%20Event%20Corrected%20Transcript.pdf

[8] reverse cuts: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h.r.3662:

[9] argued: http://blog.american.com/2012/02/u-s-navy-readiness-continues-its-decline-amidst-the-pivot-to-asia/

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.