• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama Administration Refuses Again to Protect Religious Liberty

    President Obama talked the talk but then blatantly refused to walk the walk on the freedom of religious institutions from the Obamacare statute’s mandate for group health insurance coverage of abortion-inducing drugs, contraceptives, and sterilization.  The Obama Administration continues to trample on religious liberty by issuing rules that require many religious hospitals, charities, and schools to abandon the tenets of their faiths and comply with that mandate.

    Many voices came together in objection to the interim final regulations of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Treasury and Labor Departments, implementing the Obamacare mandate, so expectations ran high that President Obama would order Secretary of HHS Kathleen Sebelius to correct the regulations and protect religious liberty before making the rules final.

    On Friday, February 10, 2012, President Obama spoke to the White House Press Corps on the issue of the mandate.  President Obama said:

    Now, as we move to implement this rule, however, we’ve been mindful that there’s another principle at stake here — and that’s the principle of religious liberty, an inalienable right that is enshrined in our Constitution.  As a citizen and as a Christian, I cherish this right.

    Having recognized the inalienable constitutional right of religious liberty, the President went on to indicate that the Obama Administration needed to address the adverse impact of the mandate on that right, not taking the year that Secretary Sebelius had previously announced she would take, but rather addressing that impact within one or two weeks:

    Now, after the many genuine concerns that have been raised over the last few weeks, as well as, frankly, the more cynical desire on the part of some to make this into a political football, it became clear that spending months hammering out a solution was not going to be an option, that we needed to move this faster.  So last week, I directed the Department of Health and Human Services to speed up the process that had already been envisioned.  We weren’t going to spend a year doing this; we’re going to spend a week or two doing this.

    Thus, in discussing the interim final regulations implementing the Obamacare statute’s mandate, President Obama stated that (1) he was mindful of the “principle of religious liberty, and inalienable right that is enshrined in our Constitution, (2) “genuine concerns” have been raised, and (3) “spending months hammering out a solution was not going to be an option,” and that “we’re going to spend a week or two doing this.”

    That was Friday.  On the following Wednesday, February 15, 2012, HHS published the final regulations in the Federal Register.  Secretary Sebelius changed nothing in the regulations in response either to the genuine concerns of the public or to the statement by the President.  Indeed, the summary of the final rules that she published in the Federal Register could not have been clearer that she changed absolutely nothing:

    SUMMARY: These regulations finalize, without change, interim final regulations authorizing the exemption of group health plans and group health insurance coverage sponsored by certain religious employers from having to cover certain preventive health services under provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    The rules trampling on religious liberty are now final and binding and will take effect on April 16, 2012.

    Apparently in response to the President’s statements, Secretary Sebelius issued, on February 10, 2012, a memorandum she called “Guidance on the Temporary Enforcement Safe Harbor.”  Her memorandum said that employers and group health plans will not, for the next year, “be subject to any enforcement action . . . for failing to cover recommended contraceptive services” if they certify to the government that they are non-profit, do not provide the mandated coverage because of their religious beliefs, and will ensure that their employees covered by their group health plan receive a government-drafted notice that their health plan will not cover contraceptive services during the year.

    Secretary Sebelius did not change the rules; she simply said she would choose not to enforce the final rules (a choice she can, of course, reverse at any time).  The Sebelius “SafeHarbor” does not address the genuine concerns about religious liberty that the President acknowledged.

    President Obama and Secretary Sebelius have simply stated that they respect religious liberty but have taken no action to change the rules to protect religious liberty.  Fortunately, other national leaders, such as Senators Roy Blunt, Kelly Ayotte, and Marco Rubio and Representative Jeff Fortenberry are taking the constitutional right of free exercise of religion enshrined in the First Amendment more seriously.

    Senator Ayotte, noting on the floor of the Senate on February 7, 2012, that the rule is “an unprecedented, unnecessary affront to religious liberty in our country,” said:

    I have heard many concerns from my constituents, and I would hope that Health and Human Services would stop what it is doing right now, this mandate that places religious institutions in this impossible position, with this impossible choice of violating their core beliefs in order to comply with a mandate or dropping employee insurance coverage altogether. We should not be putting these organizations that do great work throughout this country in that position.

    Hopefully, religious institutions, those with whom they work, and national leaders will continue to press the Obama Administration to walk the walk and change the HHS rules so that religious hospitals, charities, and schools can continue to observe the tenets of their faiths and provide health insurance coverage to their employees.

    Posted in Featured, Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Obama Administration Refuses Again to Protect Religious Liberty

    1. Jeff, Illnois says:

      Yeah . . this administration is essentially forcing all women to be sterilzed! They have absolutely no choice in the matter and soon will be forced to study and recite MAO doctrine. There is no end to the mind control and trampling on religious beliefs of this administration. There just is no other way to understand what's being promoted. Thank God the GOP has our backs and would have women carry rape pregnancies to full term, would allow industries the right to polute our air and water without check, would have Wall Street essentially run our country and would increase our military spending 10 fold if it has it's way. All the while, children would have the right to work in coal mines again, with no minimum wage and without access to public education. Thank God the GOP has our backs!

    2. Lloyd Scallan says:

      This matter is not about "religious liberty"! It's about power, the power with which Obama intends to control this nation through force. Force his ideology down our throats, regardless of laws or religion. The American people cannot depend on religious groups, much less the Catholic Church, to go against Obama. Right now the bishops and priest are making a show. But soon, they will again be preaching from the pulpits about the great Obama and his wonderful socialist utopian dream. Be assured the Church will support Obama in the end.

    3. allen says:

      To get Elected all a person has to say" I will if elected Do Away with HHS ,Engery, and TSA. You would be elected in a minute.

    4. Carol,AZ says:

      Socialism has always trump, " God and individual freedom" putting the State first.
      Naturally POTUS has trampled the Constitution. His plan is working perfectly.

    5. RennyG says:

      I say, "file for impeachment" tomorrow morning. Fill in the blanks as you go along. This is his mode of operation so why not play his game. SOMEONE, PLEASE STAND UP AND STOP THIS GUY!!!!!!!

    6. O_Henry says:

      To Jeff in Illinois…

      Could you give your sources for your assertions about Republican policies? It seems I cannot find any Republicans who advocate the things you describe i.e. “polute our air and water without check; Wall Street essentially run our country; increase our military spending 10 fold; children would have the right to work in coal mines again; no minimum wage; without access to public education.”

      No sources for your assertions, Jeff? Humm, are your assertions really believable? Do you really believe your assertions? Do you think I really believe your assertions? Do you think anyone believes your assertions?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×