• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • New START: Been There, Threatened That

    Obama and Medvedev sign new START

    Yet again, the Russians are working to strengthen their position prior to NATO’s Chicago summit coming up in May.

    Mikhail Ulyanov, director of the Security and Disarmament Department at the Foreign Ministry, stated that Russia’s withdrawal from the New Strategic Reductions Treaty (New START) “cannot be excluded.” Moscow primarily objects to the expansion of U.S. missile defense program.

    The preamble of New START recognizes the interrelationship between strategic offensive and defensive arms. Moscow has been using this link to argue that expansion of U.S. missile defense capabilities, especially in Eastern Europe, undermines the viability and effectiveness of the treaty. Moscow points out that a similar link had been found in the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which was based on the argument that it is okay to offer your adversary a free ride to kill millions of people in the name of “strategic stability.”

    It is not 1972 anymore, however, and there are other bad guys with long-range ballistic missiles in Iran or North Korea who want to kill Americans and blackmail U.S. allies. If Russia withdraws, it would lose one of its valuable vehicles for arguing for restrictions of U.S. missile defenses.

    Occasionally, Russia accompanies its threats of withdrawal from the treaty with a threat to aim its nuclear weapons on U.S. or allied territory. This should serve as a wake-up call for opponents of the missile defense program. There is no question that the U.S. should free itself and its allies from such blackmail and protect all from accidental or deliberate launches.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.