• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Family Fact of the Week: Closing the Marriage Gap Between Rich and Poor

    While economic disparities between rich and poor are vehemently decried in stump speeches and the main stream media, value differences are often considered as a third-rail issue to be avoided in public discussion. In typical fashion, Charles Murray broaches this subject head-on in his newly released book Coming Apart, which documents a cultural drift and widening gap between an upper class and a lower class in white America. Those concerned about income inequality should take notice, because research has found that values and the behavior they promote are closely linked to economic well-being.

    As Murray notes, though marriage rates fell within wealthy and low-income white Americans from 1960 to 1970, they have stabilized at just above 80 percent among the upper class since the mid-1980s, but they continued to plummet among the lower class. In 2010, within that sector of America just 48 percent were married. A similar gap also exists today regarding the number of births outside of marriage in both classes: Extra-marital births account for less than 6 percent of all births among women with a college education but an ominous 44 percent among those with only a high school education.

    Numerous studies presented in Heritage’s FamilyFacts.org have shown that marital status, particularly that of mothers, is linked to financial well-being. Married women are less likely to experience poverty, and unmarried mothers face a greater risk of welfare dependency. In fact, marriage reduces the probability that a child will be in poverty by 82 percent. Marriage brings a likelihood of greater financial success for men as well. Married men tend to have greater earnings than those in cohabiting relationships, and married individuals are more likely to own a home, accumulate savings, and attain affluence.

    Murray also cites the religious aspect of the cultural drift in America: While 40 percent of wealthy white Americans are categorized as “secular” (i.e., they profess no religion or attend worship services less than once a year), nearly 60 percent of the lower-income individuals fall into this category. Research has revealed a link between religiosity and the likelihood of marrying, marital stability, and marital satisfaction and happiness—all of which are ultimately linked to both income disparity and the growing gap between the level of happiness reported by the two classes.

    Our nation’s policymakers should not view the widening cultural gap that Murray documents as an unavoidable doomsday scenario. Rather, they should view it as a clarion call regarding the critical importance of designing policy that promotes strong and healthy marriages and ensures that Americans maintain the freedom to practice their faith and embody their religious values in their daily lives.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Family Fact of the Week: Closing the Marriage Gap Between Rich and Poor

    1. Alexander says:

      "40 percent of wealthy white Americans are categorized as “secular” (i.e., they profess no religion or attend worship services less than once a year), nearly 60 percent of the lower-income individuals fall into this category."

      That is very sad and scary, and I hard a hard time believing that these numbers are true (for I tremble what God will do to all these people), and sadly I think these numbers will only rise. Unless we stop this apathy to Christianity, it means the collapse of our way of life, and Western Civilization.

      As George Washington wisely said in his Farewell Address, after 45 years of public service: "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness."

    2. politheism says:

      This is impressively bad social science. First, if a man's salary is 3/5th, and a woman's salary is 2/5th, then if those two human beings marry, they'll have 5/5ths, which is what they started with. Second, the only vaguely interesting statistic is that a man with a wife at home makes slightly more than a man who doesn't have a wife at home. One would hope that having a partner at home to take care of all domestic duties would provide the head of household an opportunity to earn more money, yet in this case that boost appears to be less than $10,000. If you value a woman's financial contribution to the family at < $10k, then yes, marriage makes sense.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.