• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Time to End Energy Tax Subsidies

    Today, Senators Jim DeMint (R–SC) and Mike Lee (R–UT) introduced legislation that would move the United States a giant step forward in making our country’s energy market freer by eliminating targeted tax credits for energy sources and technologies.

    Their legislation, a companion to Representative Mike Pompeo’s (R–KS) bill, would force any tax policy that picks certain industries as winners and losers in the market to expire at the end of the year and expedite sunsets for tax credits extending multiple years. And it goes after all targeted tax credits: oil, renewables, nuclear, alternative fuels and vehicles, and advanced coal and gasification. And since eliminating these economically unsound tax credits would raise revenue and thus be a tax increase, the bill would offset the tax increase by lowering the corporate tax rate permanently.

    The common argument against removing the tax credits is that it would destroy jobs. But these are jobs that tax credits artificially created in the first place. It means the government diverted resources to politically preferred sectors of the economy and away from projects that demonstrate economic value. And if these producers do have an economically viable idea, then they shouldn’t need the handouts from Washington in the first place, and our taxpayer dollars are merely offsetting the investments a company would’ve made regardless.

    The detriment caused by subsidies extends well beyond wasting taxpayer dollars and propping up uneconomical ventures. It adversely affects a company’s or industry’s incentive structure by placing less emphasis on innovating to compete in the market and more emphasis on clamoring for special treatment from the government. It allows an ignorance of true production costs. The clearest example is Solyndra, the now-bankrupt solar company. Although it was a recipient of a loan guarantee, not a targeted tax credit, a breakdown from solar industry analyst Peter Lynch explains the problem with subsidies. He said of Solyndra:

    Here’s the bottom line. It costs them $6 to make a unit. They’re selling it for $3. In order to be competitive today, they have to sell it for between $1.5 and $2. That is not a viable business plan.

    In a market without subsidies, you find ways to make your product profitable. In a market with subsidies, you can ignore production costs to a certain degree, but in most cases even that model is unsustainable. Ask Solyndra, Evergreen, Ener1, and Beacon, for instance.

    Subsidies also have the additional effect of promoting lobbying rather than efficiency and affordability. In an environment of government handouts, political viability is much more important than economic viability. When the government dictates how private-sector resources are spent with targeted tax credits, those industries that benefit greatly from such policy decisions will spend more money lobbying for tax credit extensions and expansions. The American people will ultimately bear the costs of these policies through increased taxes (or deficits) and higher energy prices.

    There are three key pieces to making America’s energy production more robust than it is does: (1) open access, (2) reduce onerous regulations, and (3) eliminate subsidies. Senators DeMint and Lee’s legislation embodies the kind of approach that would get us there.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Time to End Energy Tax Subsidies

    1. Bobbie says:

      Thank you for holding these foreseeable failures accountable! It's time to stop putting Americans at an unconstitutional disadvantage in matters that are removed from our control while unwarrantably added to our expenses through the abuse of government authority. Market is always relevant in picking the winners and losers, government is NEVER! If a company can't make it on their own how lowly and unAmerican to take the rest of us down with them! Thank you Mr. Lee and all who stand on principle! It's the American way to recovery!

    2. impeach Obama says:

      one thing America needs to understand all the tax subsides given to these failed programs have a two fold purpose…to cripple our economy make us more dependent on foriegn oil…and to finacially reward Obamas campaign supporters…no one is being held accountable for the billions that are being wasted..He has threw deception and lies spent trillions of OUR money not his in the event to destroy America

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×