• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obamacare Ends Medicare (As We Know It)

    As budget season approaches, premium support is gaining traction as the only viable option to save Medicare. In a recent Politico article, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D–MD) is quoted as saying liberals will use Obamacare’s new provisions to combat a conservative budget that reforms Medicare using premium support.

    Hoyer told reporters, “Yes, we need to make Medicare viable. We believe that the health care bill—and very frankly CBO (Congressional Budget Office) believes the health care bill will do something that Medicare very badly needs, and that is to constrain price escalation in health care.” So the left is still claiming that the health care law will help sustain Medicare’s future—but Heritage just published a new Fact Sheet showing the opposite.

    Hoyer couldn’t be more wrong. Obamacare will not solve Medicare’s fiscal problem. The health law is already in the budget baseline, yet Medicare still faces trillions in unfunded obligations. Obviously, Obamacare did not solve the problem.

    The health law does cut Medicare provider payments to the tune of $575 billion, but this does nothing to increase Medicare’s solvency, because the money will be used to fund other provisions of Obamacare. And then there’s the fact that the cuts probably won’t even take effect; in its 2011 Long-term Budget Outlook, “CBO assumes that several policies designed to restrain federal spending on health care will not be continued. As a result, under that scenario, mandatory federal spending on health care programs would grow faster, reaching about 10 percent of GDP by 2035. Medicare spending would grow to about 7 percent of GDP.” The Medicare Chief Actuary has also expressed his lack of confidence: “[T]he growth rate reductions from productivity adjustments are unlikely to be sustainable on a permanent annual basis.”

    The left also points to the law’s delivery and payment system changes in Medicare as the silver bullet to reverse the program’s insolvency. But CBO attributes only meager savings to these programs, and history shows that time and again, similar attempts to use top-down micromanagement to improve efficiency and quality of care in Medicare fee-for-service have failed.

    Instead, Obamacare’s tinkering with the current program will essentially end Medicare as we know it by replacing the existing fee-for-service (FFS) payment system, the heart of traditional Medicare, with top-down payment and delivery schemes independent of the consumer choice and competition that would enable them to prove their value. Worse, new layers of bureaucracy and compliance will discourage physicians who are already wrestling with reams of paperwork and will undermine their professional independence in the practice of medicine.

    That’s not the only way Obamacare fails to make positive changes in Medicare and instead damages the current program. As detailed in a new Heritage Fact Sheet, Obamacare, with more than 160 provisions affecting Medicare, overhauls traditional Medicare. It puts the open-ended entitlement on a budget (a good idea if done correctly), but centralizes power in its Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), an unelected board that has power to recommend payment cuts that automatically go into effect unless Congress intervenes. The IPAB’s actions are subject to neither administrative nor judicial review. Simply imposing more provider payment cuts will just mean less access to care for seniors, as more providers stop taking Medicare beneficiaries.

    There is an alternative that would instead save Medicare. Heritage has a plan to enact structural reform, transforming FFS to premium support. As the Fact Sheet states, “Premium support restructures the financing of Medicare so that the market forces of competition and choice help drive down cost and improve quality. These changes provide Medicare patients with greater transparency and bigger savings for both seniors and taxpayers.”

    For a more detailed explanation of Heritage’s Medicare reform proposal, read Saving the American Dream.

    Click here to listen to this week’s Heritage in Focus podcast, in which Dr. Bob Moffit discusses his new paper, “Obamacare Ends Medicare As We Know It.”


    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Obamacare Ends Medicare (As We Know It)

    1. Bobbie says:

      what sound reason is there in having obama's nationalized health care? It exceeds all medicare fraud, waste and corruption costs?? Why is it so expensive if it saves money? Under Obama's plan, why do people need an insurance card in order to get health care? It doesn't make sense…

    2. Lloyd Scallan says:

      Again with the soft ball decription of what the Dems say. Hoyer is not "wrong", his is lying through his teeth
      because Obama told him too. Hoyer is a Dem and one of Obama chief lackeys. Do you really expect him
      to speak the truth?

    3. Jerome Bigge says:

      The more the government is involved in health care here in the US, the more costly it becomes. Americans pay twice as much for their health care than do the people in the rest of the developed world. Obamacare is a mistake. The mandates are likely to be declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. So what should we do? How about true free market health care? Get the government (all levels) out of health care. Also ask "why" do we have prescription laws in a free society? Sounds more like the sort of stuff you might find in some European "nanny state"! Without prescription laws, people can buy the medicine they need without first paying for a doctor's "permission". Of all the Republicans running for President, only Ron Paul believes in giving people the freedom to take care of their own health without government involvement. Think about that. Do we want "more of the same" from Romney (creator of Romneycare in Massachusetts) from where Obama cloned Obamacare? I don't think so. I'm voting for Ron Paul because he believes in freedom!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.