• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Governors Call for Teacher Tenure Reform, School Choice

    As the new year unfolds, governors are beginning to outline their education plans for 2012.

    Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell (R) called for changes to teacher tenure in his State of the Commonwealth speech:

    Our teachers are well educated and motivated professionals who deserve to be treated as such. Just like workers in most other jobs get reviewed every year, and are therefore able to be more accurately promoted and rewarded for their success, so too should our teachers.

    Last year, Virginia introduced a pilot merit pay program for teachers. This year, McDonnell proposed adding “more incentives and accountability to attract and retain the best and brightest teachers.”

    Noting that “a child’s educational opportunities should be determined by her intellect and work ethic, not by her neighborhood or zip code,” McDonnell also proposed a scholarship tax credit program, which would provide tax credits to corporations that contribute money toward private school scholarships for low-income students.

    New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (R) touched on similar themes in his State of the State address. His six-step education reform plan calls for tenure reform that bases tenure on a teacher’s effectiveness rather than simply on how long he or she has been in the classroom. Christie also talked of ending “last in, first out” policies and compensating teachers based on the difficulty of the school or the subject.

    Similar to McDonnell, Christie stated that perhaps the most important aspect of his education reform plan is a program to provide “tax credits to provide scholarships for low-income students in the worst-performing schools in the state.” He noted: “Opportunity should not be offered to only those in an excellent school district or with parents who have the money to release their children from the prison that is a failing school.”

    Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal (R), already a leader in school choice, called to expand education options even further for Louisiana families in this year’s inauguration address, asserting that “as long as there are children who are not receiving a quality education…our mission is not accomplished.” He spoke of the importance of educational opportunity for all students:

    In America, we believe that every child deserves an equal opportunity to a quality education.… But that is not the reality today in America.… There are many children…who do not have the same opportunity [for a quality education]. They may live in an area with public schools that are failing, and they cannot afford to move to an area with better public schools and they cannot afford private school.

    Jindal stated that “America promises equal opportunity to have success, but America does not promise equal success,” adding that the way to ensure that every child has access to a quality education “is not massive spending and tax increases.… The way forward is very simple—it is to provide more choices and more opportunities for parents, for families, for children.”

    Last year was a historic year for education reform. And 2012 can prove to be the same as state leaders promote reforms like these that support quality teaching and open the doors of educational opportunity for more American students.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Governors Call for Teacher Tenure Reform, School Choice

    1. newt had it right, working kids build self-e streem, and money managing skills, stay out of trouble and plan for money they want to make.only thing is i've been in fast food resturants and those workers i can't understand because of lack of English skill (spainsh). i had a newpaper job,shovel walks, mowed lawns; and recycle paper collection, and still enjoyed school.

      • Aaron says:

        Sorry Justin, but I find it ironic that you're criticizing other people for their "lack of English skill."

    2. Aaron says:

      I'm not sure I appreciate Governor McDonnell's assertion that “a child’s educational opportunities should be determined by her intellect and work ethic." I much prefer Governor Jindal's claim that "in America, we believe that every child deserves an equal opportunity to a quality education."

      In fact, I take issue with what McDonnell seems to be suggesting: that different people should have different educational opportunities. That's certainly the case in Europe and Asian nations where your educational possibilities are limited by the government based on their quantitative measurement of your intellect. If you want to support the idea of school choice, then you also must support the idea that everyone should have the same opportunity, not just those who have higher intellect and work ethic.

      My other issue with school choice is that it suggests education should be run the way the free market is run. The idea that competition and choice create a stronger economy is certainly worthwhile, but I don't think the same can be said of education. The free market model requires the real danger of failure in order to be effective. If there is no risk of failure, then there is no reason to reform (see: "too big to fail"). In education failure cannot be an option. The answer isn't to let the schools fail and send all those kids to another school (which only results in overcrowding and ineffective teaching). The answer is to draw great teachers into struggling schools and create campaigns to motivate families in struggling areas.

      The problems of failing schools are so great, so numerous, and so complicated that to suggest the answer is simply "more choice" and "merit-based pay" is an insult to the profession of teaching. Just goes to show you: Those who can, teach. Those who can't, make laws about teaching.

    3. Dr Marion Bean says:

      Having 35 years teaching in a non-profit college, I found that they implemented a "3 year rolling contract" once the college faculty voted to do away with "tenure." Each faculty member was reviewed in several ways during the first year of the three. If recommendations for improvements were made, those changes would be made. If changes did not occur, the faculty member would have another to change or be terminated after the third year. This was very effective. Of course we were not dealing with unions!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×