• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • D.C. Taxi Commission Faces Backlash for Sting Operation on New Car Service

    A District of Columbia city council member is calling on the city’s taxicab commission to allow competition to its “mediocre and unreliable” taxi services in the wake of a sting operation aimed at shutting down an innovative car service that officials say violates a number of city laws.

    If current law prohibits such competition, stated Mary M. Cheh (D-Ward 3), the law should be amended to allow for “improve[d] transportation options for residents and visitors alike.”

    Cheh’s statement comes days after city officials conducted a sting operation on Uber, an innovate startup company that works with local drivers to provide on-demand town car service in the metro D.C. area. (Uber also operates in New York, San Francisco, Seattle, Boston, Chicago, and Paris.)

    The company does not actually own any of the vehicles used, so its operations tend to fall into a gray area: Is Uber a taxi company, which must use metered fares, or a limousine company, which negotiates fares with riders before a trip (there are additional criteria for each)?

    The District maintains that Uber is a taxi company under city law. The city’s taxicab commissioner personally led a sting operation against the company last week, charging it with a range of violations and even impounding the vehicle.

    Assuming D.C.’s charges hold up, Cheh has called on the city government to “amend District law to permit Uber and similar companies to operate legally here.” In the amsence of such a law, Cheh noted, “it seems to me that a better approach [than the commission’s heavy-handed one] would be to encourage innovation and work with Uber and other similar businesses in order to bring them into compliance.”

    Cheh touted the need for innovation in the taxi market, which, interestingly, is also a key pillar of the taxicab commission’s mission statement, which calls for “a system of rules and regulations … that allow for technological advancements to be introduced to the industry.”

    But the specter of political gamesmanship looms over the commission’s investigation. The commissioner was appointed by the District’s new mayor, Vincent Gray, who received overwhelming – even illegal, in some instances – support from the city’s cab drivers. The commission recently raised cab fares throughout the city.

    Uber’s chief executive, Travis Kalanick, spoke at Heritage last month on the day of the company’s D.C. launch. He discussed disruptive technology and business innovation, including some of the challenges he’s faced in other cities.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities, Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to D.C. Taxi Commission Faces Backlash for Sting Operation on New Car Service

    1. amie99 says:

      one thing that i want to mention is these cars haul on the street as regular taxis instead of doing the pre arranged call all the time and that is illegal.

    2. hubataa says:

      How can a company operates with out legal permission from the commission.If it is a taxi company let it get permission like any other cab company.I heard that they have also installed meter in their car and set their own price. For instance from what I heard their drop rate is $7:00 Isn't it amazing?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×