As the ball dropped in Times Square and bells across the globe rang in the new year, the cyber world reminded us, yet again, that the new year brings significant new challenges.
To recap quickly, Stuxnet was a wild, malicious computer virus that infected the Iranian nuclear program, causing the machines that Iran uses to purify nuclear fuel to malfunction. By all accounts, Stuxnet set back the Iranian nuclear weapons program by a year. But it also infected servers around the globe in India, Indonesia, and the United States. Nobody knows who unleashed Stuxnet, but speculation centers on Israel or America.
Then came Duqu, a “cousin” of Stuxnet that operated using much the same internal structure and logic. Duqu didn’t cause machines to run poorly; it just got inside their systems and stole information (perhaps as reconnaissance for a later attack).
Now, we learn that Stuxnet and Duqu have some cousins—maybe as many as four of them. There are enough of them now that the entire family gets its own name: Tilded. These other cousins are mysterious guests in our computer systems, and nobody is quite sure yet what they will do.
But we can see some of the effects already. Duqu, for example, hijacked a server in Mumbai and used the server as a “command and control” center for its operations. Indian authorities were forced to shut the server down.
The challenges of our new cyber world are becoming increasingly clear: The Internet is a borderless, global domain, and security is only as strong as the weakest link. American security depends, in no small part, on cybersecurity in Mumbai and around the world.
This creates a profound challenge for American policy. The reality is that cybersecurity is an international issue. If there ever is a cyber war, America’s enemies will launch their attacks from overseas sites that, initially, are beyond U.S. control. We need to start developing a policy that induces bad actors in cyberspace to clean up their act. If we don’t, then next year’s New Year’s celebrations may be much less merry.

You're joking, right?! You actually think "policies" are going to protect us from cyber warfare?! I wonder if you might elucidate further on what these purported policies might look like? The term "Policy" could very easily be substituted for "regulation" or even worse, "law." None of it sounds good to me.
"Its over my HEAD"
Wake up! How many time must Obama and his lackeys tell us they demend to control the internet? It's the internet that exposes Obama and his Maxist intent for this nation. He controls the national media so the people use the internet to learn the truth. He knows is and must stop it. Remember back in November when the Obama government shut down all communication in the U.S. for three minutes? Why? If Obama can't control the internet using the FCC or any other government agency under his control, he will use whatever means he has, then blame someone or something else.
There is no way to control the internet, it is so immense and there are so many work arounds that people will always find a way to post what they want. Then on top of that you've got the issue of freedom of speech and right of expression.
About me: I’m a blogger for <a href="http://www.itrentals.com” target=”_blank”>www.itrentals.com
There is no way to control the internet, it is so immense and there are so many work arounds that people will always find a way to post what they want. Then on top of that you've got the issue of freedom of speech and right of expression.