• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • 'You're On Your Own Economics' Is an Ironic Straw Man

    In his recent speech in Kansas, President Obama accused Republicans of advocating “you’re on your own economics”—a philosophy that supposedly holds that “we are better off when everyone is left to fend for themselves and play by their own rules.”

    The implication is that unless you favor raising taxes and levying stricter economic regulations, Obama assumes you want to leave poor people out in the cold. In contrast, the President promotes his own economic ethic in the following terms: “We are greater together than we are on our own.”

    While Obama’s populist slogans may be catchy, they misrepresent the nature of free markets as well as the social effects of government redistribution.

    Contrary to the President’s straw-man characterizations, the free market advocated by most conservatives isn’t a free-for-all. It requires the rule of law, the enforcement of contracts, and protection against fraud, corruption, and criminal activity. In other words, the free market relies on adherence to an agreed set of rules—the very thing Obama accuses it of subverting.

    The free market also demands trust, cooperation, and communication. It requires discernment about what people are looking for and how best to provide it to them. In this sense, the free market engenders a focus on others—it entails searching for interactions that are considered mutually advantageous by both parties.

    It’s true that within a free-market system some people will remain in need of material assistance (that’s true of all large-scale economic systems known to man). But the answer to this need isn’t primarily through forced government redistribution; it lies, in part, in voluntarily using the great wealth that free markets generate to create and sustain civil society institutions that improve lives.

    The most effective ways to help the poor often come from churches, ministries, local businesses, and nonprofits, as the stories from our Seek Social Justice curriculum show. Because they can foster horizontal bonds of care and responsibility among members, these institutions are better equipped to provide the needy with a sense of supportive community—a sense of “we.”

    In contrast, when Obama says “we are greater together than we are on our own,” the “we” he refers to is the nation-state, centered on the federal government. This is why he seems to measure care and compassion for those in poverty primarily in terms of government spending.

    But when government assumes ever greater responsibility for the poor through redistribution programs, it tends to crowd out smaller local institutions, weakening their social role and authority. As a result, horizontal bonds among citizens tend to erode while vertical bonds between individuals and the state tend to grow tighter.

    Ironically, Obama’s populist rhetoric actually betrays an underlying philosophy that weakens community-building institutions, leaving isolated individuals more likely to turn to the impersonal state to meet their needs. If Obama is serious about critiquing an on-your-own individualism—and instead promoting communities of mutual responsibility and care—he should begin by changing his rhetoric. We need a vision for America that incites less class warfare and dependence on government and encourages more economic growth and strengthening of civil society.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to 'You're On Your Own Economics' Is an Ironic Straw Man

    1. Prfssrpah says:

      A major drive among socialist nation-states is to minimize or eradicate the traditional social service networks as described above (Churches, non-profits, Salvation Army). As long as the poor have an alternate network to go to the state's influence is jeopardized. The state would prefer total dependence on a monopoly basis to the impoverished and those in need as they could then dictate terms and as a matter of allegiance demand those on the dole to vote for more government and government services. The US with its continued unemployment benefits (now entering 3 years) is in the process of creating a new dependent permanent clientele–the permanently unemployed.

    2. Andre says:

      so you want to put the disab led back in institutions the same ones that in the past before ssi and social security treated people worse then cattle. your being as wrong as the left only here there for a cradle to grave nursery your for a cradle to grave nightmare. No the best way to fix things is end all programs but ssi and social security raise those two to somewhere between 3 and 5k and allow the disabled to save up to 2 times what they get over 10 years then let us pay the original amount back it would work. in fact its the only really workable way to fix things.

    3. Bobbie says:

      Really! An educated "to be assumed" goal all along of the American government leadership of free people. To get people off government dependency not be the safety net to maintain the class of "poor." we are not greater together with government, MR. President. You are an expense of your abuse of authority that without, we wouldn't be so poor. American people shouldn't have to pay you to look to you to handle their livelihoods. You govern what we can't beyond our livelihoods. Please learn what freedom is and stay out of it. Government interference is not freedom. Now learn your business and stay out of ours and stop targeting our personal resources. We can do it together without the expense of your governmental abuse of authority and lack of discipline…

    4. DEBT
      9-30-01-5700 Billion
      9-30-09—11,900 Billion
      +11,200 Billion

      9-30-09 11,900 Billion
      +3000 Billion

      5100 Billion added by Bush NEW Programs
      1400 Billion added by Obama NEW programs

      78% by Bush NEW programs
      22% by OBama NEW programs

    5. olemike says:

      Excellent article. The Great Divider does not know what he is talking about.

    6. Mike, Wichita Falls says:

      It is ironic that the premier community organizer purposefully seeks to destroy communities.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.