• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Russian Missile Defense Statements Fictional, Not Factual

    In the latest exercise in fact-twisting, General Nikolai Makarov, Russian Chief of the General Staff, said that Russia is being pushed toward an arms race because of U.S. plans to deploy missile defenses in Europe.

    Markarov continued, “We are prepared to cooperate, to build a missile defense together. Why don’t they meet us halfway?” In fact, the United States has gone more than half way, and similar accusations are nothing but an exercise in bellicose rhetoric.

    These and similar threats are an attempt to restrain the U.S. missile defense capability. Moscow is interested in keeping the U.S. and its allies’ populations vulnerable to a ballistic missile attack. Any limitations—be it shared command and control or a sectorial approach to missile defense—would have negative implications for the U.S.’s ability to protect itself and its allies.

    After all, missile defenses target a missile en route toward its victims. There is no reason why the U.S. should not engage a missile just because the launch location happens to be in Russia. It is up to Russia to move toward a more defensive posture and increase the level of transparency regarding its missile defense and military plans.

    Judging by its actions, one can see that Russia is far from moving toward a more defensive posture. While the U.S. is cutting its defense budget and is the only country in the world without a substantial nuclear weapons modernization program, Russia is engaged in the largest nuclear build-up since the end of the Cold War.

    Moscow is planning on modernizing its intercontinental-range ballistic missiles (ICBMs) so that fifth-generation ICBMs would make up at least 80 percent of its arsenals by the beginning of 2018. The Kremlin is also planning on deploying as many as eight nuclear-capable submarines available in the 2025–2030 timeframe and is developing a new strategic bomber. In addition, while Russian officials are regularly updated on U.S. missile defense plans, there is very little reciprocal effort on the Russian side.

    Ballistic missile proliferation trends are growing worse. Iran might be able to hit anywhere in the United States by 2015. The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in its November 2011 report that Iran has a nuclear weapons program underway. North Korea is already capable of hitting Hawaii and Alaska. Clearly, this is not the time to limit U.S. missile defenses.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Russian Missile Defense Statements Fictional, Not Factual

    1. clint says:

      Please. How about some minimal fact-ckecking? You say "The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in its November 2011 report that Iran has a nuclear weapons program underway."

      This is false. If you bother to read the report it says:

      “was stopped rather abruptly pursuant to a ‘halt order’ instruction issued in late 2003.” and that “the agency’s ability to construct an equally good understanding of activities in Iran after the end of 2003 is reduced, due to the more limited information available.”

      Also, our DNI said in March that he has high confidence that Iran has not restarted its weapons research program that was suspended in 2003.

      As for the Russian concerns with missile defense, please see the report from the scientists at FAS:

      If you wanted to have a system to counter Russian nukes then we cannot have signed the New START treaty.

    2. Michaela Bendikova says:

      I meant the November 2011 report. See the White House statement by the press secretary:

      "Last week, IAEA Director General Amano issued a stark report, laying out in graphic detail Iran’s systematic efforts to develop a nuclear weapon. While the United States was not surprised by these findings, the whole world now knows that Iran not only sought to hide its uranium enrichment program from the world for more than two decades, but also engaged in covert research and development related to activities that can have only one application: building a nuclear warhead for delivery on a ballistic missile."

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.