• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Dark Days for Democracy in Nicaragua

    With his win in the November 6 election, Daniel Ortega secured his third presidential term in Nicaragua. While few would deny the leader’s popularity, thanks in large part to aid from Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, the legitimacy of his position has been called into question because of the circumstances surrounding his win—and because the Nicaraguan constitution allows presidents to serve only two terms in office.

    Out of concern for the validity of the recent election, members on both sides of the aisle in the U.S. Congress have called for further examination of the political process, which was marred by numerous complaints of fraud and other irregularities. Reports indicate that monitors were refused entrance to certain stations to oversee voting and that Nicaraguans likely to support the opposition had trouble obtaining identification cards required for voting.

    In response to the flawed election, Senator Marco Rubio (R–FL) and Senator Robert Menendez (D–NJ) have introduced a resolution “calling attention to the deterioration of constitutional order in Nicaragua.” The document notes that numerous organizations, including the U.S. State Department, the European Union Election Observation Mission, and the Mission of Electoral Accompaniment of the Organization of American States, recognized a lack of transparency in the proceedings, leading to doubts about the legitimacy of the election.

    The House Committee on Foreign Affairs also held a recent hearing to investigate the matter entitled “Democracy Held Hostage in Nicaragua: Part I,” during which Ambassador Jaime Daremblum testified to the need for the international community to stand against this attack on Nicaragua’s democracy. He stated that “By rigging elections, trampling the constitution, persecuting his political opponents, and bullying journalists, [Ortega] has laid the foundation for another Sandinista dictatorship.”

    Also testifying at the hearing was Ambassador Robert Callahan, who echoed Daremblum’s concerns, saying that “Daniel Ortega’s candidacy was illegal, illegitimate, and unconstitutional.” Most tellingly, he pointed out that “the published results showed that Nicaraguans cast over 100,000 more votes for assembly candidates than for president, although all candidates appeared on the same ballot….it would seem very odd that so many more people cast a vote for legislators than for a president in the same election.”

    While Ortega does enjoy considerable popularity in Nicaragua, mostly due to policies such as government handouts for the poor, his refusal to respect the nation’s constitution and resorting to running roughshod over the electoral process is reminiscent of practices associated with the dictatorship of the Somoza family. To prevent Nicaragua from going down this path, the international community must pressure Ortega to institute reforms that restore transparency, build an independent and nonpartisan electoral council, preserve term limits, and strengthen civil society.

    Jen Gieselman is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Dark Days for Democracy in Nicaragua

    1. Freedom Lover says:

      You want to talk about getting away with political thievery, check out the aveage wallet of the governing representatives in the West, especially the US. Vote or not vote you get the same Ortega-Chevez or Deocrat-Republican bought outcome. Staying in power has such perks, last as long as you can and the windfall will far outlast the inevitabe outster much later.
      The penalties of abuse get past on to the future generatios, like Trillions of dollars in debt. Ortega got baway with it and everyone should have reacted way before the known fraudulent elections took place, he does have a tract record and he changed the constitution a long time ago.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.