• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • After the Super Committee: 'Massive' Education Cuts? Think Again

    The “super committee’s” failure to reach an agreement to reduce federal spending is supposed to trigger automatic spending cuts—some of which could decrease funding for the Department of Education beginning in 2013. This has the education unions and Secretary Arne Duncan up in arms.

    Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, stated that this decrease in funding represents “drastic across-the-board cuts to vital programs” resulting in “massive reductions to education programs.”

    “Massive”? Let’s put this in perspective. The total cuts, if enacted—which some suggest is doubtful—would represent a 7.8 percent decrease in funding for the Department of Education, equaling about $3.5 billion. Considering how much money has been pumped into the department’s budget over the last several years, this is a comparatively small amount. In the last decade, education spending has increased by 57 percent, adjusting for inflation. On top of this, the President infused the Department’s budget with nearly $100 billion in 2009 as part of the stimulus act, and just last summer, Democrats in Congress threw them another $10 billion through the “edujobs” bill.

    Federal per-pupil K–12 spending has more than doubled since 1970. Today, the Department of Education’s discretionary budget is the third largest of all federal agencies, ranking only behind the Department of Defense and the Department of Health and Human Services.

    Yet all of this spending on the roughly 150 “vital” federally funded education programs has little to show in the way of improved student achievement. Despite ever-increasing education spending, the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress report confirms that student achievement continues the same nearly flatline trend Americans have seen for decades.

    Taxpayers across the nation are demanding that the federal government take the financial steps necessary to put our nation back on a wise economic course. After years of failed education programs supported by the taxpayer’s dime, citizens—adults and children alike—deserve better.

    Instead of continuing to pour money into unsuccessful Washington programs, systemic reform is needed. Proposals set forth by the House Education & the Workforce Committee attempt to achieve this goal by not only cutting ineffective education programs but also by giving state leaders flexibility to use education dollars as their states deem best. Along similar lines, the A–PLUS Act, proposed by Senator Jim DeMint (R–SC) and Representative Rob Bishop (R–UT), would provide states flexibility to opt out of federal programs outlined in No Child Left Behind. Instead, states would be able to create their own plans for student achievement.

    More federal dollars are not the answer to improving education, as history shows. Allowing states to use their dollars more effectively is key to promoting policies tailored to the needs of individual students.

    Posted in Education, Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to After the Super Committee: 'Massive' Education Cuts? Think Again

    1. Bobbie says:

      the fed department of education proves to be moved by money only. what their paid to do they fail to do without corrections or accountability, only to demand more money without reason or worth. they have students learning socialistic curricular in opposition to the benefit of American free society. the government is teaching facts by twisting and misleading them. the proof of the results of public education is taking the time to yell and scream on any street that shows people working to provide for their own. Education within the federal government's control proves that public education is in direct conflict of America and what she is called to stand for, self worth and basic human principles the federal government encourages America's people to fight against!

    2. MOMwithAbrain says:

      Thanking GOD for the failure!! This is a WIN for taxpayers and parents!!

    3. Guest says:

      Cut is ALL. 100%

    4. Illusionaryr says:

      There should be no department of education in the federal government. Any funding to the states for education should be approved by congress only. There is nothing in the constitution that support such an arm of the executive branch. How many federal employees work for the dep of ed. perhaps their salaries and operating costs should be applied to the schools. get rid of it entirely

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.