• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Supercommittee Failed, and Spending Is Still the Problem

    Tax hikes were the focal point of the contentious, failed supercommittee negotiations designed to reduce the national debt by at least $1.2 trillion. Democrats wanted massive tax hikes. Republicans flirted with a tax reform deal lowering rates and closing loopholes. But the fact that tax hikes were at the center of the debate indicates that the committee – which includes Michigan Reps. Dave Camp and Fred Upton – fails to grasp the true nature of our debt crisis.

    Overspending, especially on entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, is the cause of our debt problem.

    Higher taxes are unnecessary because there is enough revenue flowing into Washington as long as Congress holds spending to historical levels. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), with all current tax policies, including the Bush tax cuts, tax revenue will surpass its historical average as a share of the economy in a decade. And should the economy break the shackles of growth-impeding Obama policies faster than CBO anticipates, tax revenues will exceed that mark much sooner.

    On the other hand, in 2021 the federal government will spend 26 percent of the economy, well in excess of its historical average of 20 percent. And it will keep growing on this trajectory, primarily because of the growth in entitlements. The data is clear. We have a spending problem – not a taxing problem.

    Congress would have to continually raise taxes to keep up with continually increasing costs. The growing tax burden would stifle the economy and threaten the prosperity of future generations.

    Advocates of raising taxes often resort to the argument that debt reduction requires spending cuts and tax increases. But they’re merely revealing their preference for bigger government. Higher taxes lead to bigger government because Congress always spends the extra revenue it raises. The new taxes never go to deficit reduction. That’s why any deal that offers spending cuts in exchange for tax hikes is fundamentally unbalanced – despite the president’s claims.

    Higher taxes would go to pay for the spending increases that President Obama and his allies foisted upon the country – including stimulus spending, Obamacare, and a host of other big government programs. Unless they’re reformed, entitlement programs would also devour new tax revenue as more baby boomers retire.

    Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush learned the tax-and-spend lesson the hard way. They agreed to deals that were supposed to cut spending and raise taxes. While the tax hikes became permanent law, succeeding Congresses were under no obligation to abide by the agreed-upon spending levels and quickly undid them. The same would be true today if Congress strikes a similar deal.

    Anyone agreeing to hike taxes is surrendering to a permanently bigger government and tax burden that will reverse our relatively low tax burden compared to other developed nations that for the last 65 years has facilitated the growth that made our economy the envy of the world.

    There are better alternatives that keep government limited and provide a strong safety net for those that need it most – without raising taxes. For starters, The Heritage Foundation proposed the “Saving the American Dream” plan that balances the budget in 10 years and keeps it balanced in perpetuity by transforming Social Security and Medicare into actual insurance to keep seniors out of poverty and help those most in need.

    The strange policy bedfellows of the National Taxpayer’s Union and Public Interest Research Group also put forth a plan that makes 54 specific budget-cutting recommendations that would cut $1 trillion from the federal budget.

    With so many ideas for reducing spending in Washington, tax hikes are simply unnecessary. We can tackle the debt problem at its source and turn back the growth of government without raising taxes.

    Co-authored by Michael LaFaive, director of the Mackinac Center’s Morey Fiscal Policy Initiative.

    Cross-posted from The Michigan View.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Supercommittee Failed, and Spending Is Still the Problem

    1. Mike says:

      Super com was created to stall for time, provide political cover to extend the theiving. Federalism has been destroyed by the left. I can no longer support or help fund its existance. Time to let the states do their own governing.

    2. Stirling says:

      It's amazing the False arguement for Taxes, since any tax by nature reduces the ammount of activity in what is taxed. This is how backwards washington has become recently…

    3. Topcat says:

      GDP = private consumption + gross private investment + government spending + (exports − imports)

      Why is government spending a plus in the calculation of GDP. All the other factors in the calculation represent assets which make sense , spending seems to have no place mixed with assets . Calculating this way encourages government spending to keep GDP numbers up.

      • Laura W. says:

        It's supposed to approximate the value of government goods and services, which are generally not sold on the market, so the cost of inputs is used as a roundabout way to determine the value, in lieu of an actual market price. (Of course, this figure would be inflated by any inefficiency in providing said goods and services.)

    4. Lloyd Scallan says:

      Many of us knew from the first day the leftist and RINOs chosen for the "supecommittee" were picked because they would never reach any agreement. This entire ploy was to fool the American people into thinking Congress is actually doing the will of the people. We had better wake up and understand most of both Dems and Repbs in Washington have no intention to stop the out of control spending. But they must continue lying and distorting for a chance at reelection.

    5. dan az says:

      Vote Ron Paul

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.