• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Debate Night: How Should Americans Think About International Organizations?

    Tonight, the GOP presidential candidates square off in Washington, D.C., at the CNN/Heritage/AEI debate to discuss foreign policy and national security. But so much of U.S. foreign policy depends on how to secure American independence in an age of global governance. How, then, should we think about international organizations?

    In his new addition to the Understanding America series entitled “How Should Americans Think About International Organizations?,” Heritage’s Brett Schaefer argues that the United States should determine its level of involvement in international organizations by carefully considering each organization’s effectiveness and alignment with U.S. interests.

    Before the U.S. joins an international organization, that organization’s interests must be aligned with those of the U.S. For instance, in 2000, the U.S. did not join the International Criminal Court (ICC) because the court’s jurisdiction interfered with the role of the U.S. judiciary.

    But what about assessing an organization of which the U.S. is already a member? If an international organization is not effective, then the U.S. should prudentially determine its level of involvement in it. Similarly, if an international organization begins to undermine U.S. interests, then the U.S. should either apply pressure to force a change or decrease its involvement.

    For instance, the U.S. scaled back its support and leveraged force against UNESCO by cutting its funding for accepting the membership bid of Palestinian Authority, an organization often hostile to U.S. interests.

    International organizations are not an end in themselves but a means to an end—namely, U.S. interests abroad. To determine its level of participation, the U.S. should constantly reevaluate each organization’s alignment with U.S. interests and ability to fulfill those interests.

    Tonight’s debate offers a perfect opportunity to see if any of the primary candidates can articulate a prudent and principled approach to dealing with international organizations.

    John Brooks is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Click here to view this post in Spanish at Libertad.org.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×