• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Congress's Unrealistic Demands on Air Cargo Security Continue

    Congress is at it again. Earlier this month, Representatives Bennie Thompson (D–MS), Edward Markey (D–MA), and Sheila Jackson Lee (D–TX), sent a letter to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) demanding to know how the agency planned to meet the congressional mandate requiring the 100 percent screening of air cargo. This letter came just days after the TSA announced it did not plan to meet the December 31 deadline for the screening of all international U.S.-bound cargo.

    In 2007, Congress passed the Implementing 9/11 Commission Recommendation Act. The bill included a blanket requirement for the TSA to screen all air cargo carried on U.S.-bound passenger planes by August 2010. Despite the fact that the mandate offered little added security at a very high cost, the TSA, in partnership with the air cargo industry, was able to achieve the complete screening of all domestic cargo by the August deadline. International U.S.-bound cargo, however, was a different story.

    In a recent hearing, TSA Administrator John Pistole confirmed that his agency is negotiating screening agreements with the 20 countries where 80 percent of U.S.-bound international cargo originates. Yet, as homeland security expert Chris Battle explains, “certain members of Congress continue to demand that the U.S. government, via TSA, somehow force other governments to follow U.S. regulations.”

    Rather than making unrealistic and unjustified demands of our international allies, Congress and the Administration should take a risk-based approach to air cargo screening, prioritizing screening based on starting point, declared contents, etc. By prioritizing screening efforts based on manifest information and intelligence, the TSA would be able to focus on potential high-risk threats and best protect the American public.

    Ultimately, Representatives Thompson, Markey, and Jackson can insist on 100 percent cargo screening all they want. It won’t change the facts. 100 percent screening will never equate to 100 percent security. It’s time for Congress and the Administration to take a better approach.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Congress's Unrealistic Demands on Air Cargo Security Continue

    1. Jon Lacey says:

      America is the only country that can keep the freedom/peace on earth, right now!
      So we need a powerful Navy to keep all commerce moving around the world, port ,to port, friendly, and other, at the same time, protecting America, and it's friends.
      Our military also doesn't need a large Army, we need our carriers, and special opp's people, no more land bases, that's old war, no more general killing, of American's or other.
      One more positive about our Navy, and Marines, not many reporters/corresponds out there to tell all the good things their doing.

    2. Eric Ward says:

      Jon, you need to learn 1st grade grammar before you begin to interpret who needs what in the world.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×