• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama NLRB Trying to Steal Jobs

    The Grinch who stole Christmas has some competition in Washington. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) appears determined to steal Thanksgiving from employers and employees.

    On Friday the NLRB announced it will vote on November 30 to revamp organizing elections to heavily favor unions.

    Currently, unions build support at a company for months before calling for a vote. Management often has no idea that such activity is going on. Once organizers believe they have enough support, they ask the NLRB to conduct a secret-ballot election. Typically the vote occurs five to six weeks after the election petition.

    This gives the employer time to make their case. Unsurprisingly, union organizers rarely talk about strike histories, political spending, or corruption within their unions. Nor do they bring up the times their union failed to deliver on campaign promises. The five-week window lets workers hear the strongest arguments from both sides and cast an informed vote.

    This system has worked well for decades. Unfortunately for the union movement, however, few workers today want to buy what they are selling. Only one in 10 non-union workers say they want to join a union. As a result, private-sector union membership has slipped below 7 percent.

    Rather than reform to become more relevant to today’s workers, unions want to change the rules to make it harder to decline their services. One way to win an election is preventing the other side from campaigning. So President Obama’s appointees on the NLRB have proposed new regulations shortening the time period for elections to as little as 10–14 days (“snap elections”). Employers would have little time to respond to union claims before workers vote. This would greatly facilitate union organizing—but only by depriving workers of valuable information.

    However, the NLRB has a problem. Over 65,000 Americans filed comments during the public notice and comment period on this rule. The law requires the NLRB to carefully consider these objections. But Craig Becker’s recess appointment to the NLRB expires at the end of the year, at which point the NLRB can no longer legally function.

    So the NLRB is taking extraordinary steps to ensure that snap elections happen before Becker’s term expires. The NLRB announced on Friday that it would vote on a modified regulation on November 30. How it was modified no one outside the NLRB majority knows—not even Brian Hayes, the NLRB’s one Republican member. Presumably it will include only the sections the NLRB has already processed comments on. To ensure that it gets finished by the end of the year, the NRLB has denied Hayes time to write a dissent.

    The Obama NLRB is committed to fixing organizing elections in favor of unions—despite the fact that unionized companies create fewer jobs.

    The Grinch stole only Christmas presents. The NLRB’s plans would steal jobs.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Obama NLRB Trying to Steal Jobs

    1. A Conservative Woman says:

      This is the progressives at their most basic and diabolical! POTUS thinks he is clever and the American people are so stupid, not to mention that we "have become lazy over the past couple of decades". All the more reason to get rid of this man. I don't want to wake up some Monday morning and find that my country has been turned into a socialist-"for the workers" type of state. The American people just want a job; the unions don't provide those nor does the government. NLRB has got to stop functioning. It is just another tool in Obama's statist-toolbox to provide the "change" only he knew the truth about. God Bless the US and help us save it!

    2. George Leef says:

      This demonstrates once again how terribly politicized the NLRB has become. It is time — in fact long past time — to repeal the National Labor Relations Act and put labor relations law back in the hands of the states where it belongs under the Constitution.

    3. Ardath Blauvelt says:

      Typical Left tactics — bend the rules, break the rules, change the rules — whatever it takes.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×