• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Where Can Congress Find Room to Cut? Look to Obamacare.

    Where can Congress’ “super committee” find its $1.2-trillion target in savings?

    The answer is hidden in plain sight.  The money could come from Obamacare, to avoid implementing its huge expenses.  Repealing the health care law would solve the super committee’s dilemma, yielding more than enough savings to fulfill their mission.

    Yet Obamacare has been placed “off-limits” for no good reason.

    As POLITICO noted:

    “Anyone tracking the super committee has heard the mantra: Everything is on the table.  But there’s one big item that doesn’t appear to be on that gigantic deficit-cutting table: President Barack Obama’s health reform law, his signature domestic achievement.”

    By itself, repeal of Obamacare would more than fulfill the mission assigned to the super committee.  If we didn’t have the expense of Obamacare, it would save more than the $1.2-trillion in savings they are supposed to find over the next 10 years.

    But in most quarters, the silence about repeal is deafening.  Not so, though, for Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT), who is making a determined but overlooked effort through his HR 3243, “The Common Sense Deficit Reduction Act.”

    Rehberg goes after the costliest parts of Obamacare now, before they kick in and Americans become dependent upon them.  They include taking out the expansions of Medicaid and the health insurance premium subsidies that are projected to cost $1.379-trillion over the next 10 years.  As analysts Nina Owcharenko and Jim Capretta note in their paper, “The reality is that the new health care law will result in trillions in unaffordable deficit spending.

    The Congressman points out that Obamacare’s brand-new entitlement programs are not yet operative, so nobody’s current benefits would be lost or reduced.  Cutting out those Obamacare programs would also avoid the defense cuts and Medicare cuts that otherwise would occur (under sequestration law) if the super committee fails to find $1.2-trillion somewhere else.

    Rehberg knows the damage ahead if Obamacare stands; he chairs the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee.  HR 3243 is silent on all others aspect of Obamacare save the massive spending expansions, so issues like the individual mandate remain would untouched until after the Supreme Court rules on its constitutionality.

    The bottom line is that Rehberg’s proposal points out a key fact that most politicians are ignoring:  The simplest way to meet the super committee’s $1.2-trillion goal is to stop new spending before it happens, by undoing Obamacare’s subsidies and Medicaid expansion.

    After that, we should get all of Congress—not just the super committee–focused on reforming entitlements and cutting spending, but not raising taxes.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Where Can Congress Find Room to Cut? Look to Obamacare.

    1. Bobbie says:

      how can one issue directly unconstitutional be off the table? that is highly suspicious! deeply concerning! democrats are crying cuts will take away domestic programs? programs? this is a good time for democrats to admit to their program recipients with compassion, that democrats went beyond the line wrongfully stealing other peoples money, for their votes to give them their programs of "want." It has to be corrected at this time. programs are better served and fair when recipients are footing their own bill or go without.

      • maryanne3935 says:

        you know Bobbie y ou are right. When I go through all my e mails regarding how this administration and the democrats are dividing us on just about every issue, and make conservatives the bad guys, when the liberals are raping, beating, drugging and preaching hatred and then they say it is coming from us, sometimes it is just too much. You keep fighting this evil and believe me this is evil. They get the kids to go along because they have never been taught to think, and most of them, haven't had a bad day in years because of their caretaking parents, now the parents want th em off their wallets and into ours. Wow who would have thought that personal responsibility would be a bad word in America.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×