• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Goodbye to Venezuela’s Globovision?

    On October 7, 2012, the Venezuelan people will have the opportunity to elect a new president. In the months leading up to the election, Venezuelans are sure to hear plenty of campaign rhetoric from the unabashed President Hugo Chavez, but the question is: How much will they hear from the opposition?

    Globovision, a television channel that is reportedly “the only channel in Venezuela that takes a staunchly anti-government stance,” has been fined more than $2 million by the country’s National Telecommunications Commission, Conatel, for allegedly “violating broadcast regulations” when it showed footage of a riot at the El Rodeo II Prison in the Venezuelan city of Guatire. According to Conatel, among the opposition station’s offenses is the repeated broadcasting of interviews with inmates’ family members and the addition of the sound of gunfire to clips. The director general of Conatel claims that the broadcast “promoted hatred and intolerance for political reasons.”

    Restrictions on media freedom are nothing new in Venezuela. In 2007, Chavez’s government shut down the station Radio Caracas Televisión (RCTV) due to its “support for a brief coup in 2002.” Like Globovision, RCTV was known as an opposition station. During the 2002 coup, RCTV showed footage of protests, while other private and state-owned media outlets reserved their coverage mainly for interviews with government officials and soap operas, according to The New York Times.

    The story didn’t end with the closing of RCTV. In 2010, Globovision co-owner Nelson Mezerhane received a phone call from Chavez, who allegedly told him, “I need for you to fix this Globovision. This cannot go on like this. Fix it or take the consequences.” Mezerhane declined, only to have his bank taken over by the government and his home invaded by Venezuelan security forces shortly thereafter. Mezerhane is currently living in the United States, where he is awaiting news on his request for asylum. Adding fuel to an already volatile situation, his attorney “believes his case…has disappeared into a bureaucratic black hole along with dozens of other high-profile Venezuelan political asylum cases” in order to prevent the U.S. from having to provoke Chavez.

    Meanwhile, the fate of Globovision hangs in the balance. The station has called the fine “unpayable,” asserting that it is just the government’s way of closing down Globovision. Members of the international community insist that “the fine [is] an abuse of power by the government.” Yet the government is not slowing down. Just last week, Venezuelan soldiers removed equipment from a radio station that the National Telecommunications Commission said “[had] been operating without government authorization.” Venezuelan human rights leader Carlos Correa said that for other outlets, “[seeing] that a critical media outlet is punished steers others toward self-censorship.”

    Whether Globovision can survive the fine has yet to be seen. What is certain, however, is that this record of doling out heavy-handed punishments to opposition stations is likely to influence the broadcasting decisions made by Venezuelan media in the future and give Chavez an unfair advantage in his bid to keep the presidency.

    Jen Gieselman is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Goodbye to Venezuela’s Globovision?

    1. jay garcia says:

      Well this article ignores that globovison edited the clips with gun fire shots to intesify the new reports causing panic to family members who have their loved ones in the prison. They aslo repeated a couple of family pleas in dispare after watching the initial reports with fake gun fire over three hundred times blowing the situation out of porportion. The owner of that station should be arrested for causing panic in the public, he has a duty to the people but of course he doesen't care. He is an elite bastard that cares only for the money he lost after the government confiscated it. That money should be given to the families for being put under extreme stress. This is shamfull.

    2. Jose Castañeda says:

      In any case, who should be arrested are the officials responsible for the penitentiary system that provokes and permits the violent situations in Venezuelan prisions. Drugs and arms are dealt freely inside the prisons and they are overcrowded and in such a bad shape that the human rights of inmates and family members are in no way guaranteed. The Chavez regime tries once again to blame the messenger for the problems in the country instead of working to find solutions.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.