• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • It's Not that Easy to "Bow Out" of Obamacare

    Last week’s Des Moines Register’s editorial page takes a sardonic view of the majority of Americans (51 percent as of last week) who are opposed to the health reform law. Saying they are trashing the law they call Obamacare—a word that supporters have openly embraced because of its widespread usage—the editorial charges “if you don’t agree with the law, then don’t use anything it offers.”

    Oh, if it was only that simple. While the editorial correctly notes that Obamacare is not a full government takeover of the private health sector, it is a massive exercise in federal micromanagement of private coverage that will dramatically reduce patient options.

    Let’s examine a few ways the Des Moines Register says Americans could bypass Obamacare. According to the editorial, the public should find a new health plan if they have moral issues with mandated preventive services that now fund contraceptives. Hello—mandated preventive services means no insurer can back out of the requirement without paying huge fines. Heritage Foundation’s health insurance expert Edmund Haislmaier examined the penalties implemented by the Health and Human Services Department and found:

    “What is clear, however, is that significant penalties could be imposed on insurers and employer health plans if they fail to comply with HHS benefit dictates. The existing federal health insurance statute—now amended by [the Patient Protection and Affordable Act] to include the new benefit mandates—contains an enforcement section that provides for fines of up to ‘$100 for each day for each individual with respect to which such a failure occurs.’[10] Thus, for a plan with just 100 enrollees, the potential fines could be as much as $10,000 per day.”

    Obviously, insurers and employers aren’t going to risk incurring those fines, so patients don’t have coverage alternatives that exclude the mandated benefits. In fact, the only way to avoid the essential benefits would be relying on health care financing such as cash-only medical provides or individualized supplemental plans like hospital indemnity policies that aren’t regulated by Obamacare. But the idea that Obamacare allows insurers to even offer comprehensive insurance packages outside of its essential benefit mandates is false.

    Another editorial assertion is that small business owners who don’t like Obamacare should not take advantage of any tax credits offered. Interestingly, the Treasury Department’s latest report showed that fewer small businesses than expected are claiming Obamacare’s tax break. The Wall Street Journal writes:

    “By mid-May only about 228,000 taxpayers had claimed the small business health-care tax credit established in last year’s health-care overhaul, costing the federal government a total of $278 million in lost revenue, according to a report released Monday from the Treasury Inspector General of Tax Administration.

    The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the official number-cruncher for Congress, had earlier estimated that the tax break would cost up to $2 billion for tax year 2010 and $37 billion over 10 years.”

    Treasury officials cited complexity in filing for the tax credit (the IRS still hasn’t pinpointed eligible businesses) for the low participation, but maybe some of those owners are already taking a stand.

    The editorial manages to concede in its “challenge” that Obamacare’s individual mandate doesn’t allow uninsured Americans to simply avoid the health law. But while saying it opposes this measure, the paper concludes that Americans can choose the mandate’s penalty because it’s cheaper than paying for an average health premium. Rather than encouraging more Americans to become uninsured, the better option would be mandate-less health reform.

    The rest of the editorial’s recommendations boil down to Obamacare opponents putting up or shutting up—by rejecting Medicare or other taxpayer subsidized health plans and looking to the private sector. There would be something to this argument if Obamacare didn’t impose a bureaucratic straightjacket on private coverage.

    The real solution is to give patients more control over their health care dollars. Heritage has shown how consumer-driven health care policies can help more people gain coverage while handling issues like preexisting conditions, all without letting a centralized bureaucracy make health care decisions. We believe that’s something more Americans will want as Obamacare comes into full effect.

    The paper could check out the Haislmaier’s speech this week at Drake University in Des Moines. He’ll better detail how Obamacare turns private health insurance into a regulated public utility.

    Posted in Featured, Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to It's Not that Easy to "Bow Out" of Obamacare

    1. Bobbie says:

      It just doesn't make sufficient sense? if the purpose of Obamacare is free health care to all, why the need or purpose for insurance??? it's just paper! with gross counter productive make work. It's bureaucratic control over the people's own! corruption! it's needless with an agenda that contradicts quality care, quality health. government health will either consist of massive waste or be as little as they make legally possible. it's all in their control. Personal freedom and freedom of choice, eliminated! Can't sue ourselves when malpractice hits and government protects or takes no accountability as proven time and again! this is totally dangerous and unconstitutional. Please protect Americans and America's dignity!

    2. zff says:

      So in other words, we all have to dramatically reduce our choices because of a law we didn't ask for and we can't even use any minor positive aspect of it to offfset the massive negatives or we're hypocrites? Go to heck, Des Moines Register.

      And yes, it is a complete takeover because it regulates all parts of the medical system, so no matter what you use the Obamacare hands will be in it. For instance, ObamaCare mandates all kings of things for hospitals, and does anybody really think that does not affect hospital indemnity policies? Medical providers face a slew of new regulations and mandates, and we're supposed to believe that doesn't affect cash only plans as well as other plans?

    3. howiem says:

      It might be interesting to look back at all the things that the CBO has scored that actually came to pass and compare the results with the claims of the CBO.

    4. thsldu says:

      It wasn't that easy for politicians to get us into the mess also. Why did commie-leon Maobama insist on its passing while the majority of US citizens didn't want it because of its unconstitutional implementation and excessive cost? Now Obama wants to tax us for the money to implement it!!!!!!!!! He and his kind are sooooo gone in Nov. 2012.

    5. Victoria DeLacy says:

      When the Supreme justices rediscover their collective spinal column, the hope is that Obamacare may be at long last overturned based on the unconstitutional individual mandate, without which it cannot work. Once that has been accomplished, we can go about tweaking the health care system we have to make it more effective in caring for the health needs of our people, without having thrown the baby out with the bath water so to speak.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×