• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Hold Pakistan Accountable in Afghanistan

    With the 2014 Afghan troop withdrawal quickly approaching, a recent House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia hearing stressed the need to press Pakistan to fight terrorists who find sanctuary on its soil.

    In this most recent hearing, the four witnesses, including former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalizad, presented a united stance on the need to hold Pakistan accountable for its actions in the region. Lisa Curtis, a senior fellow for South Asia in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation, has been encouraging the U.S. to get tough with Pakistan over its role in Afghanistan for some time.

    One of the common themes of the hearing was the need for the United States to promote Afghan independence and ensure Pakistan ceases support for militant actions that would ultimately create increased security concerns for both Pakistan and Afghanistan. While there was consensus on the importance of having Pakistan fully join the U.S. in fighting terrorism, Dr. Christine Fair, an associate professor at Georgetown University, was far less optimistic about the potential for gaining such cooperation. She argued that Pakistan is directly undermining U.S. objectives in Afghanistan and that the United States should halt its decade-long policy of appeasing Pakistan.

    The four members of this panel seemed to share the belief that 2014 is far too soon for the United States to transfer full security responsibility to the Afghans. While Lieutenant General David Barno, former commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, acknowledged the importance of setting timelines for a troop drawdown, he also admitted that the U.S. had not achieved its goals for training Afghan security forces in the time frame it had set out. If the Afghans are unable to do their job now with such a large American presence, he questioned whether they would be up to the task of defending their country by the 2014 withdrawal deadline.

    Dr. Ashley Tellis of the Carnegie Endowment argues that a 2014 date simply allows the Taliban and other militant groups to run down the clock until American forces leave. The best thing the U.S. could do, he said, is renounce all artificial deadlines for withdrawal from Afghanistan. But barring that, as the Administration does not seem so inclined, the United States can mitigate the problem by declaring soon exactly what the post–2014 presence in Afghanistan will look like.

    Understanding the U.S. role in Afghanistan beyond 2014 is crucial to ensuring Pakistan works with us in fighting terrorism. Pakistan has a sordid past of fighting certain terrorist groups while supporting others such as the Haaqani network, which Pakistan sees as an important tool against India. As Fair put it:

    The Pakistanis have become very accustomed of taking advantage of historic events by saying they support our goals but then take advantage of us and then funnel this into their own security goals. We have been fooled into thinking we have a security relationship with Pakistan.

    Pakistan’s habit of supporting some terrorist groups while fighting others is crippling the U.S. ability to achieve its security objectives in the region. The time to hold Pakistan accountable for how it deals with terrorists is long past due.

    Unfortunately, the United States does not have a consistent Pakistan strategy, and Fair expressed fears that at some point—when the United States returns to normal relations with Pakistan—it will continue to support violence and terrorism throughout the region. By allowing this to happen, the United States will lose the progress it has made in Afghanistan and see the continued rise of terrorist groups whose aim is to attack American interests.

    Jeffrey Meyer is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

     

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Hold Pakistan Accountable in Afghanistan

    1. @GregSavoy says:

      Both the countries that formerly formed Pashtunia would be happy to be the eastern most border of the soft-caliphate that is currently unfurling. Don;t kid yourself. We were never there to be their friend. Why are we concerned about their feelings, my-oh-my.

      In reality, we should be concerned about their compulsions. America is there simply to intervene in a global religious virus, period. If you have any thoughts in your head about getting along with Allah's gang, then pay the Dminni tax or kiss your beloved head good-bye. No, we got a mission, We will and must stay throughout the ages evermore. We're America. Form a line.

    2. Amir says:

      Mmmm… probably the author forgot to mention another country to hold accountable for the mess in Afghanistan… Mmm… can anyone guess that country? Mmmm.. I'm becoming old… ahaaaa!!! that's USA. How about holding a foreign occupier responsible for all that mess instead of throwing the blames on a neighboring country whose people are being killed by the same "mess"? Hmm… again, i think the author is short-sighted. well, aren't we all? ;)

    3. J William Wiiliston says:

      The USA most definitely needs to keep the deadly virus of islamist lunacy totally contained. Re: Afghanistan: Save U.S. lives and money!! Do not send more troops. Get them home. Use a massive force of drones to seal the borders, a la the iraq no fly zones writ large. Once the borders are sealed, let the saner elements of Afghan society, (assuming there are any.), deal with the islamist-taliban throat slitters.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×