• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Offshore Drilling Plan Lacks Something: More Drilling

    Yesterday, the Department of Interior released its new five-year offshore drilling plan. Unfortunately, the program is far less expansive when it comes to opening areas to access, exploration, and drilling than it should be.

    The plan schedules 15 possible lease sales in the 2012–2017 time horizon—10 in the central and western Gulf of Mexico, two in the central Gulf, and three off the coast of Alaska.

    More glaring, however, is the areas that are still off-limits. The Atlantic and Pacific coasts, areas the Obama Administration once considered opening, remain closed to more drilling. The Arctic oil and gas drilling is extremely modest and should have been much more aggressive.

    Granted, some of the new lease sales would not have been for a few years, but there’s a good bet that in those few years we’re going to need jobs, oil, and federal government revenue. If there’s a commercial interest to explore and drill in these areas, our federal government should allow companies to pursue them.

    National Ocean Industries Association president Randall Luthi emphasized the problem with excluding Virginia in a press release:

    A particularly disturbing omission from the next program is a lease sale offshore Virginia, despite clear support from the Commonwealth. While we have seen a history of deference to states that do not want development off their shores, this represents a new direction in the history of American offshore development. Despite the strong bipartisan support for inclusion from the Governor, the Legislature, both Senators, and a majority of the congressional delegation, and even its inclusion in the previous 5 year plan, they are being denied. As the Department of the Interior has repeatedly made clear, it would not be issuing new permits if it was not convinced that it could be done safely. If we can move ahead in the Gulf of Mexico to provide new energy and jobs to the nation, surely we can meet these challenges elsewhere in the [Outer Continental Shelf].

    Both of Virginia’s Senators, Jim Webb (D) and Mark Warner (D), expressed disappointment in the department’s decision to exclude Virginia. Senator Webb said, “Oil and gas exploration within the Virginia Outer Continental Shelf—if coupled with an equitable formula for sharing revenues between the state and federal governments—would boost domestic energy production, while benefiting the commonwealth’s economy.”

    Among the many broken pieces of America’s offshore energy policy is the split between federal and state government royalty revenue. Implementing an even split would go a long way to encourage more offshore oil and gas production and promote states’ rights.

    Senator Lisa Murkowski (R–AK) offered some encouraging words: “While the administration has not opened any new areas to leasing, I’m encouraged that they are moving forward with offering sales in both the Beaufort and Chukchi seas.”

    But she also raised an important, overlooked issue: “The permitting process will be the determining factor as to whether these lease sales are ultimately successful or not.”

    Federal regulators should work to return the permitting process to pre-moratorium levels and provide a sensible time limit for legal challenges so these projects aren’t held up for years like Shell’s exploration endeavor off the coasts of Alaska. Allowing access for exploration and creating an efficient regulatory process that allows energy projects to move forward in a timely manner would not only increase revenue through more royalties, leases, and rent; it would also create jobs and help lower energy prices in the process.

    Posted in Energy, Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Offshore Drilling Plan Lacks Something: More Drilling

    1. mtnhiker says:

      The headlines in the Mainstream press tout this as a vast opening of areas that can now be drilled. The pronouncement by the Department of the Interior is a joke. They can charge the companies for the leases but then due to the other buracracies in the Federal Government – not authorize anything until all the criteria are met – like environmental impact studies, safety and mitigation plans etc. All of these things can take years and delay actual drilling or recovery of oil from the leases.
      Given this adminstratiosn war on energy productions _ oil, coal, and nuclear – I would believe very little that anyone in this administration or anuy of its multiiple czars says.

    2. mtnhiker says:

      The headlines in the Mainstream press tout this as a vast opening of areas that can now be drilled. The pronouncement by the Department of the Interior is a joke. They can charge the companies for the leases but then due to the other buracracies in the Federal Government – not authorize anything until all the criteria are met – like environmental impact studies, safety and mitigation plans etc. All of these things can take years and delay actual drilling or recovery of oil from the leases.__ Given this adminstratiosn war on energy productions _ oil, coal, and nuclear – I would believe very little that anyone in this administration or anuy of its multiiple czars says.

    3. mtnhiker says:

      The headlines in the Mainstream press tout this as a vast opening of areas that can now be drilled. The pronouncement by the Department of the Interior is a joke. They can charge the companies for the leases but then due to the other bureaucracies in the Federal Government – not authorize anything until all the criteria are met – like environmental impact studies, safety and mitigation plans etc. All of these things can take years and delay actual drilling or recovery of oil from the leases.__ Given this adminstration war on energy productions _ oil, coal, and nuclear – I would believe very little that anyone in this administration or any of its multiple czars says.

    4. mtnhiker says:

      The headlines in the Mainstream press tout this as a vast opening of areas that can now be drilled. The pronouncement by the Department of the Interior is a joke. They can charge the companies for the leases but then due to the other buracracies in the Federal Government – not authorize anything until all the criteria are met – like environmental impact studies, safety and mitigation plans etc. All of these things can take years and delay actual drilling or recovery of oil from the leases.__ Given this adminstration's war on energy production _ oil, coal, and nuclear – I would believe very little that anyone in this administration says nor would I believe any of its multiiple czars.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×