• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Austerity Successes in Previous Downturns

    The left continues to resist any suggestion of spending cuts right now. In their view, a depressed economy is no time to slash spending; that would only further weaken demand. The successful austerity policies adopted in response to the downturn of 1920, however, offer a clear rebuttal to this notion. And this is not an isolated instance in the heap of economic history. Similar government restraint and cutbacks marshaled strong recoveries from the depressions of 1837 and 1893.

    In 1837, financial panic swept the country. According to economist Jim Powell, the money supply fell by more than one-third for the next four years, prices fell by 40 percent, and investment fell, too. Nevertheless, output actually increased between 6 percent and 16 percent.

    President Martin Van Buren was determined to get government out of the way. He met the depression head on by slashing spending and taxes. Powell points out that “Federal spending was cut from $37.2 million in 1837 to $24.3 million in 1840, and taxes (mainly tariff revenue) went down, too.”

    The result? Despite the absence of a central bank (Andrew Jackson had killed it in 1836), the economy came roaring back to prosperity a few years later, from what some consider a depression worse than any other up until the Great Depression. John Steele Gordon adds that federal revenues more than tripled one year into the recovery. Revenues “had been a miserable $8.3 million in 1843, the lowest in decades,” he writes. “But the following year they jumped to $29 million.”

    Another instance of successful government restraint was in dealing with the depression of 1893. President Grover Cleveland believed that government should impose as little cost on taxpayers as possible. Consequently, once financial panic hit in 1893, Cleveland refused to spend federal money. He vetoed a $10,000 spending measure to help farmers in Texas. His veto read: “federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character.” He vetoed 299 other spending bills.

    David Whitten of Auburn University observes that “real GNP fell about 4% from 1892 to 1893 and another 6% from 1893 to 1894. By 1895 the economy had grown past its earlier peak …” Though another short contraction followed and full recovery didn’t happen until a few years later, the worst of the depression had ended.

    The examples of government restraint in 1837, 1893, and 1920 demonstrate how dynamic and flexible the free market can be if left to its own devices. Though unfashionable to assert these days, the economy recovers best when government spends and taxes least.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Austerity Successes in Previous Downturns

    1. Tim says:

      The world was a very different place in the 1800s…

    2. YnotNOW says:

      Yes, Tim, the world was a very different place in the 1800s. People still understood our founding ideals of freedom and self-reliance. And knew that government expansion to "help" them would only erode these ideals, and create a longer-term dependence that would weaken our economy and our country. Yes, the world is a very different place today. <sigh>

    3. Todd says:

      The world was a very different place in the 1800s… but the economic priniples still apply today.

    4. Bobbie says:

      "impose as little cost on taxpayers as possible!" this holds strong, respectful, decent American standards within governmental leadership, none of America deserves less. none of humanity deserves less! hold ALL people accountable to carry out their civil/ personal responsibilities as once held which logically builds self reliance. Stop the government perversion bailing out irresponsibilities. The people of this country today (whose own weakness reflects America's) can show strength and endurance if people could look in the mirror and take their own lumps without infringing on everyone else! everybody hides behind GOVERNMENT! Poor display of America(ns.) the damaged, narrow mindsets of today, think austerity has to come from government!?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.