• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Microblogging: The Latest Challenge for China's Censors

    China has the dubious distinction of being one of the most controlled information environments in the world. Yet even China’s army of censors can at times have trouble staying on top of the vast sea of communication that flows through the Internet. The most recent challenge to government control is microblogging sites like Twitter, which produce a prodigious volume of output. Twitter itself is, of course, outlawed by the Chinese government, which created a number of internal Internet services, like the popular Weibo microblogging service. Ironically, that has now proven difficult to control.

    China’s State Council Information Office, whose job it is to control information on the Internet, let it be known that it sees a need to weigh in on the issue of microblogs, reports chinarealtimereport, an online publication of The Wall Street Journal. The specific target in question is Weibo, which many feared would be shut down after an incident this summer when an unprecedented outpouring of public anger on Weibo overwhelmed the capacity of China’s censors. Bloggers by the millions took to their keyboards to deplore the poor government response to the crash of two high-speed trains near the city of Wenzhou, which left 40 people dead and 190 wounded.

    Tighter regulation seems to be the choice the Chinese government has made. At a conference on microblogging in Beijing on Thursday, Wang Chen, the director of the State Council’s Information Office, stated that microblogging should “serve the works of the Party and the nation” and be used to “popularize sciences, advance culture and project social morality.” This would then be conducive to a “healthy” online environment—“healthy,” of course, in the eyes of the government, which stifles any political dissent.

    Managing the growth of online communication is a major challenge for the Chinese Communist Party. While Beijing seeks to expand Internet access to foster economic growth in poor rural areas (two-thirds of China is still beyond Internet reach), it has far from given up on restricting freedom of expression and diversity of opinion.

    In its 2011 report, released to Congress on October 10, the Congressional Executive Commission on China (CECC) says, “This past year was marked by a major crackdown on Internet and press freedom that exemplified the range of tools officials can use to restrict the free flow of information. The crackdown began in mid-February following protests in the Middle East and North Africa and the appearance of online calls for ‘Jasmine’ protests in China.”

    The CECC, which focuses on human rights, freedom of expression, and labor issues, further finds that over the past year:

    • Chinese officials continued to restrict free expression, including criticism of the Communist Party and peaceful dissent.

    • Censors continued to block online information deemed politically sensitive, including news of the Nobel Peace Prize award to imprisoned intellectual and reform advocate Liu Xiaobo, the calls for “Jasmine” protests, and words such as “human rights” and “democracy.”

    • Officials insisted that there would be “no change in the Party’s control over the media.” They continued to issue broad guidance as well as specific directives, such as how to cover the protests in the Middle East and North Africa. Harassment of foreign journalists reached a new high, including beatings and threats of expulsion.

    • Officials continued to arbitrarily restrict expression by abusing vague criminal law as well as broad regulations and registration applicable to journalists, publishers, news media, and the Internet. Critics of the government were charged with “subversion.”

    There is absolutely no doubt that the Internet presents a double-edged sword and a huge challenge to China’s censors, as it does to those of Iran and other closed societies. Controlling information has become that much harder in the age of the Internet. Yet, there is equally no doubt that Chinese officials will continue to do their level best to stay on top.

    U.S. policymakers must take into account documentation such as the CECC’s reports when reviewing U.S. communications strategy, an issue that came before the Broadcasting Board of Governors on Thursday.

    While the success of China’s microbloggers is to be congratulated, too narrow a focus on the Internet will prevent the U.S. government from getting reliable information through to the Chinese people. For optimal results, the U.S. needs all the communications tools at its disposal—including satellite television and short-wave radio as well as the Internet.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Microblogging: The Latest Challenge for China's Censors

    1. RedWhiteBlue says:

      The Chinese people generally laugh at the childish propaganda attempted by clueless Westerners, especially content that is so wacky that it is OUTLAWED for broadcast within the propagandist's own country!! NONE of what VOA or RFA or any of the other alphabet soup propaganda broadcast can lawfully be done in the United States. You will have to draw your own conclusion on the veracity.

      At least give the Commies credit, in that what they tell the world, they tell the world. CCTV is available in the same formats anywhere in the world, including within China.

    2. RedWhiteBlue says:

      To assert that China's microblogging is "Twitter like", is like saying that a Chinese meal that took hours to cook is like that Walmart sold bagged salad you throw together for lunch.

      Twitter is 140 characters. That averages about 15 words. The Chinese microblogs are about 150 Chinese characters. That is equivalent to about 250 English words in general, since the Chinese language is much more content rich than English words. Chinese microblogs are true news sources. In comparison, Twitter is rudimentary and crude. There's not much you can say in 15 words (or even 30, assuming you use abbreviations).

      Beijing is clearly not afraid of the microblog. In fact many of the top leaders read blogs on a regular basis, to get unfiltered opinions.

    3. Douglas says:

      As an expat living in China, let me assure you that the Great Chinese Firewall is full of holes. Anyone here can buy software called a virtual private network (VPN) for a few dollars a month, and a VPN lets you go access any website anywhere in the world without censorship or restriction. The Party doesn't mind this so much – the Party is content to let the 90 million Party members and other members of the elite strata of society have unlimited access to real news; indeed, the Party understands that such access is necessary for China to grow economically and become a leading global power; rather, the Party just wants to keep control over the masses. The Party's nightmare is not another Tienamen Square; it's a few million peasants marching on Beijing as has happened not infrequently in the past.

      As for Mr. RedWhiteBlue above – he's what the Chinese call a "50-cent man." That's because he works for the Party (or one of its agencies or affiliates) and is paid a few pennies for each blog post he makes parroting the Party line on some foreign website. Don't pay any attention to him.

      • RedWhiteBlue says:


        At least you admit that anyone who wants internet access can have access in China.

        Do you disagree with my facts? If you have better, post them. Or even if you disagree with my point of view, you can argue your own. Resorting to name calling is so . . . cheap.

        Government is government and will behave like government anywhere in the world. Just look at how NY dealt with the OWS crew. So if you are implying that Western governments do not (or at least do not care to) keep control over the masses, you are either inaccurate or you are not being true.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.