• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Scribecast: J. Christian Adams on Obama's 'Lawless' Justice Department

    In June 2010, J. Christian Adams resigned his post as a career attorney in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. Adams cited DOJ’s decision to abandon prosecution of two members of the New Black Panther Party who had brandished weapons outside of a Philadelphia polling station in 2008, shouting racial slurs at passers-by.

    Adams called it “the simplest and most obvious violation of federal law I saw in my Justice Department career.”

    The decision to drop the case – made by top officials at the Civil Rights Division – was part of a very pronounced pattern at the Justice Department, which Adams documents at length in his new book Injustice. He details the “racialist” approach to civil rights law that pervades the Justice Department, its roots in the “racial grievance industry,” and its consequences for the integrity of American elections.

    Listen to the interview with J. Christian Adams on this week’s Scribecast

    From the fight against voter ID laws to the disenfranchisement of white voters to efforts to pack DOJ’s Civil Rights Division with zealous left-wing ideologues, the trends documented in Injustice are as brazen as they are alarming. Adams’s thorough reporting and professional insight offer the most comprehensive and frightening account to date of the Obama administration’s attempts to exact racial retribution through the federal government’s law enforcement powers.

    In speaking with Scribe, Adams described the administration’s approach to civil rights law with a single word: lawlessness. “This is not only lawlessness,” he writes in Injustice, “it is the most dangerous kind of lawlessness – for history shows that once a nation’s laws cease to apply to the law enforcers, individual liberty does not survive for long.”

    Posted in Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Scribecast: J. Christian Adams on Obama's 'Lawless' Justice Department

    1. carol,az says:

      ATT. Adams has my admiration and deep respect for not caving-in to uphold our American legal system and this obstruction for American law.
      It was my understanding that this case was heard by Judicial Watch.Is it possible you could update?

      • t.p.terrorist says:

        I second carol,az remarks, and I'd also like to know how Mr. Adams is being treated. I would have been very scared to deal with this administration. We are in very deep trouble in the U.S. and I am not sure we have a chance in hell, to get out of it.

      • Bobbie says:

        I third carol's remarks! See what a conscience can do? Wish more people out of our control had one!!

    2. Erik Osbun says:

      The intent of the DOJ is to enable election fraud in 2012.

    3. steve morton says:

      How can I get in contact with J. Christian Adams about a similar case of "selective enforcement" by the DOJ?
      Steve Morton

    4. susanm says:

      JOKE OF THE DAY….. A THOUGHT, DIP YOUR FINGER IN BLUE INK? JUST LIKE IRAQ ETC. SEE IF THEY LIKE THAT ONE, NO NEED FOR ID… MAKE SURE THE INK WILL STAY ON FOR DAYS…

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×