• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • IRS’s Difficulty Collecting Obamacare Tanning Tax Is a Troubling Sign

    President Obama is fond of saying he hasn’t raised anyone’s taxes. How soon he forgets the $500 billion tax hike in his health care law. Obamacare raised 18 separate taxes and included a brand new 10 percent excise tax on tanning beds. The tanning bed tax started in July 2010.

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) should have little trouble collecting this ridiculous tax. It already collects several other excise taxes on things like alcohol, tobacco, and gas. And the federal government has collected excises since the beginning of the republic. An increase of the excise tax on whiskey caused the Whiskey Rebellion back in the 1790s. But things haven’t gone as smoothly for the IRS as they should have. From USA Today:

    Using an April 2010 Indoor Tanning Association estimate, the IRS initially projected the tax would be due quarterly from roughly 25,000 stand-alone tanning salons, plus spas, health clubs and beauty parlors.

    But the inspector general report found that actual tax returns filed for the first three quarters through March 31 averaged just above 10,300.

    Tanning tax receipts for that nine-month period totaled $54.4 million, the report found. That was below projections by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation [JCT], which had estimated the tax would raise $50 million in the last three months of fiscal year 2010 and $200 million for the full 2011 fiscal year.

    Once the IRS gets its act together, the tanning tax might collect what the JCT estimated it would. It is too soon to tell for sure. It should not be forgotten, however, that one of the motivations for this tax was to discourage Americans from tanning. So a built-in feature for the proponents of the tax would be revenues coming up short, because that would mean fewer people were tanning. If the tanning tax is successful in this regard, it will also mean that the claims that Obamacare wouldn’t add to the deficit are even more specious than they already are.

    The difficulty the IRS is having collecting the tanning tax is a worrying harbinger of more trouble to come for Obamacare. Besides collecting all the taxes Obamacare increased, the IRS has to determine if all 300 million Americans have health insurance approved by the Department of Health and Human Services—every month! If the IRS has so much trouble collecting a simple excise tax from a few thousand businesses, how is it going to achieve the exponentially more daunting task of determining if every citizen has government-approved health insurance 12 times a year?

    The answer will undoubtedly be a heap of more regulations and a mountain of new bureaucratic forms—especially for businesses already drowning under a tidal wave of regulations and tax forms. Bigger government, which Obamacare undoubtedly represents, requires the government to be more intrusive and impose more costs and more burdens on people and businesses to comply with its many mandates.

    Just as President Obama turns his attention to job creation after almost three years in office with an unacceptably high unemployment rate, his signature legislative achievement is promising to burden businesses with new costs they can ill afford. The timing couldn’t be worse for the President, the economy, and those out-of-work Americans searching for a job.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to IRS’s Difficulty Collecting Obamacare Tanning Tax Is a Troubling Sign

    1. sablegsd says:

      He makes me sick. Will obamacare help me?

    2. JoelD says:

      You mean that free people respond to incentives and dis-incentives by changing their behavior?! How terrible for the statists! I guess that explains why Obama and the "Progressive" Democrats want so badly to limit our freedoms.

    3. Jim says:

      The fact that the IRS has trouble collecting a tax isn't a "troubling" sign, it's a wonderful sign.

    4. Bobbie says:

      government overreach. what people decide for themselves taking their own risks and paying their own medical costs, doesn't need interference by a corrupt government who knows no, has no, respects no bounds.

    5. Patti says:

      If Obamacare is held constitutional, with any luck it will collapse on itself from chaotic government intervention. Can we ever wake up from this nightmare the American people have foisted on us? Why do people drink the Kool Aid so eagerly and will they be willing to change course in 2012? God help us!

    6. SJ Gunter says:

      A tanning tax is racist. How many non-caucasian people use tanning beds? None of my kin use them (I am Tslagi). We are dark enough and content to be as we are. Can't say I've seen any Asians, Indians, Middle Easterners, Africans or Hawaiians popping into any tanning booths either. Are skin bleaching agents taxed as well? If not, then this would seem to be a tax on people based on their genetics. Some may wonder why a 'Native American' is sticking up for white people. Well, it is quite simple really. Justice. Regardless of race creed or colour. If you are tolerant of injustice for one, you are culpable for injustice toward all. Justice truly should be blind…but not gullible. Simply stated: This tax is unjust.

    7. Julie says:

      This article is correct. However, it doesnt explain that when this tax was imposed the IRS never sent out letters or any type of advisory as to when this tax was due (quarterly or annually). But, because they are the IRS they imposed a stiff penalty for not knowing this information that was never revealed. If a salon owner didnt watch the news, they NEVER would have known about this excise tax being due, and if they didnt search the IRS website, they never would have known when it was due. This was not a fair tax and was not fairly imposed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.