• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Chairman Buck McKeon: Further Defense Cuts Don’t Make Any Sense

    While America tries to reduce its debt and get its financial house in order, it should not take a penny more out of defense, argues House Armed Services Committee chairman Buck McKeon (R–CA) in The Wall Street Journal.

    “Priority No. 1” for the “supercommittee,” argues Chairman McKeon, “should be: not a penny more out of defense.” The Defense Department, while making up less than 20 percent of the federal budget, has contributed to half of America’s deficit-reduction since 2009. Contrary to popular belief, defense spending has already been “on the table.” In the words of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, more cuts would “be shooting ourselves in the head.”

    If the supercommittee fails to reach agreement on deficit reduction, the law triggers automatic spending “sequestration” cuts of $1.2 trillion—of which roughly half a trillion or more would come from the Department of Defense’s budget. Such cuts would kill upwards of 800,000 active-duty, civilian, and industrial American jobs and inflate the unemployment rate by a full percentage point.

    The cuts would deeply undermine the Marine Corps’s role as the expeditionary force in ready, leading to the smallest force in 50 years. They would take the Army below pre-9/11 troop levels, and the Air Force would have two-thirds fewer fighters and strategic bombers than in 1990. And last but not least, the Navy would have to mothball over 60 ships, including two carrier battle groups.

    McKeon, as chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and privy to a wealth of information about the capabilities and role the U.S. military plays in the world, eloquently warns that these cuts to the Navy would endanger not only national security but also the global economy. The Navy defends freedom from those who attack us and secures vital sea lanes of commerce around the world worth over $14 trillion annually.

    McKeon reminds us that the men and women of the U.S. military are putting their lives in danger every day to provide us with the freedoms we hold dear. Personnel costs make up over half of the defense budget because it costs exponentially more to sustain a U.S. service member than it does to keep a Chinese, Iranian, or North Korean soldier under arms. By continuing to slash cut the defense budget, we are simply putting their lives in great risk.

    This brings to mind the oft-stated remark of a prominent member of the House Armed Services Committee, Representative Randy Forbes (R–VA): “I don’t want [our soldiers] ever to be in a fair fight. I want them to be in a fight that we know that they are going to win.”

    Finally, McKeon challenged the U.S. Congress and the supercommittee to go after the debt crisis by going after the real drivers of America’s bulging debt—the Big Three entitlements—not the defense budget.

    Jackson Marsteller is a member of the Young Leaders Program at the Heritage Foundation. Click here for more information on interning at Heritage.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Chairman Buck McKeon: Further Defense Cuts Don’t Make Any Sense

    1. Bobbie says:

      as far as priorities are concerned and all other areas of government set backs (fraud,) their main purpose is defense and should be the last thing cut not the first thing looked at which the president continues to compromise since his inauguration!


    2. Dixon says:

      So this — entitlement spending for the defense industry — is one are where government spending DOES create jobs? But money for an infastructure bank, to keep firefighters and teachers (other public employees like soldiers) employed is "wasteful spending?" Does McKeon have his head screwed on tight?

    3. veteran says:

      If congress and the president dont get this straight soon, then people like my self whove put over ten years of military service for simply love of ones nation and doing whats right for america would have been for nuthing, were they should make cuts is to the money congressmen , senators and the president make,not to that private who makes less then 25 thousand a year to feed his family let lawmakers suffer for a change, and when china comes knocking and the US military is to small and weak to stop them, you can say hello to the new communist america under chinese control.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.