• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • House Members Ask DOJ to Investigate Bank Fees -- Will the Trail Lead Back to Them?

    Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), author of the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory bill

    When Bank of America announced a new $5 debit card fee in late September (along with a slew of other banks), President Barack Obama condemned it, and yesterday some Democrat Members of Congress called on Attorney General Eric Holder to launch an investigation. Unfortunately, they’re setting their sights on the wrong target. Instead of taking banks to task for the new charges, they should focus their attention on the “Durbin Amendment” to the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory reform law, authored by Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL).

    This week, five House Democrats sent a letter to Holder in which they allege that banks have colluded in deciding to impose new fees, writing:

    Statements made by individual banks and their trade associations raise questions about whether some price increases that have occurred this year have actually been coordinated… We are concerned that [Bank of America]’s announcement may be a reaction to, and participation in, price signaling or collusion that has occurred among and between banks and bank associations.

    Likewise, President Obama criticized the banks’ fees and used them as an excuse to advance his Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB)–a regulatory agency with unparalleled powers and virtually no accountability:

    “(T)his is exactly why we need this consumer finance protection bureau that we set up that is ready to go … (T)his is exactly why we need somebody who’s sole job it is to prevent this kind of stuff from happening. … (Y)ou can stop it because it — if you — if you say to the banks, ’You don’t have some inherent right just to, you know, get a certain amount of profit. If your customers are being mistreated.’

    For these Democrats to call for an investigation into businesses reacting to “price signaling” is tantamount to alleging capitalism is illegal. And what they ignore is the real reason for the new fees. Under the Durbin Amendment, the federal government now limits the amount of money banks can charge merchants when you swipe your debit card, costing them an estimated $6.6 billion per year in revenue. Deprived of fees from merchants, banks are looking to make up the revenue taken away by the price controls.

    Broken down into simpler terms, there was a cause, and then there was an effect. The cause was a new regulation that led to banks losing $6.6 billion in revenue. The effect was banks looking elsewhere to make up their costs. And when government imposes new costs, businesses can choose to transfer them to customers. Likewise, those customers can decide to take their business elsewhere.

    It’s simple enough to understand, but evidently not for Washington politicians who want to demagogue banks to score populist points, divert blame from, themselves, and use the issue as an excuse to expand the power of the state.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to House Members Ask DOJ to Investigate Bank Fees -- Will the Trail Lead Back to Them?

    1. If you ask a Mitt Romney supporter why they like him, most of the responses are: He acts/seems/looks Presidential, and he has a Business Background.

      If you ask a Herman Cain supporter why they like him, most of the responses are: He has a Business Background, and he isn't a Politician.

      If you ask a Rick Perry supporter why they like him, most of the responses are: He is from Texas, and he is a Strong Conservative (which is not true).

      But, if you ask a Ron Paul supporter why they like him, most of the responses are: Well, he wants to End the Federal Reserve, Limit the Power of Government, Stay out of Undeclared Foreign Wars, He is Pro-Life, He Predicted the Housing Bubble, He believes in the Constitution, He Wants The Gold Standard (Hard Money) Back, He Wants to Eliminate the Departments of Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Commerce, and Interior, and he would take a Presidential Salary of just $39,336 (A 90% Pay-Cut).

      I think Ron Paul supporters are so hard-core because they actually know what they are getting when they vote for him. Liberty and Principles. Vote For Ron Paul In the Primaries!

      Follow My Blog: http://www.facebook.com/LibertarianConservative

      • blondenblueeyed says:

        Yeah and Ron Paul also co-sponsored a bill with non other than Barney Frank to LEGALIZE pot!
        A detail you conveniently left out of your post. As for me and my family we will be voting for someone else.

      • Bobbie says:

        We love Ron Paul, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann! The only ones that stand firm and true to their convictions. All important to the recovery of America! Rick Santorum is faithfully patriotic, but sends a mixed message to too many. Newt's too iffy, his commercial with Nancy Pelosi etc,.

    2. Lloyd Scallan says:

      Wait a minute! For these House members to ask THIS DOJ to investigate is more than absure. This DOJ is under "investigation" themseles. This is yet another diversion tactic to fool the American people into thinking they are doing something good for the nation. Nothing could be futher from the truth.

      • Bobbie says:

        good call, Lloyd! Someone better catch it! Pretty soon the people will come to know government IS more trouble then they're worth! I just hope it's peaceful…

    3. gstanski says:

      Before we start railing against BofA's $5 fee or any other of the new fees that big banks have been introducing lately, we should consider what got us at this situation in the first place. All of these reviled fees are in response to the fall in revenues from debit card transactions that are the consequence of the passing of the Durbin Amendment and the Federal Reserve ruling to cap debit interchange at $0.22 + 0.05% of the transaction amount.

      Everyone who was paying attention to what was happening knew that this was coming and warned against it. Here is what we wrote: http://blog.unibulmerchantservices.com/banks-may-

      The point is that, if the government decides that a large portion of a business' revenues would be collected by someone else, the business will look for ways to make up for its losses and they would do it any way they can. Banks are certainly no different.

    4. Angry about rising debit card fees? It's a consequence of Dodd-Frank, the Durbin Amendment & over-regulation from Washington. See for yourself: http://ow.ly/72pK2

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.