• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Google Makes a Pitch for Free Market

    Google is growing up. That was the message company representatives shared at Heritage this week on the Silicon Valley behemoth’s 13th birthday. (Click here to watch video of the event.)

    Google is making the case for the free market — and taking its message to conservatives. The Heritage Foundation hosted representatives from Google at Tuesday’s Bloggers Briefing. The meeting came just a few days after a Senate hearing in which Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt was grilled by lawmakers over the company’s search engine ranking practices.

    The search engine giant recently added former Republican staffers to round out its ranks and build relationships with organizations and lawmakers on the right. Lee Dunn, a former aide to Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), is one of the recent additions.

    “You have to remember Google is a new company, and I think they were learning the ways of Washington,” Dunn said about the tech giant’s past activities and recent efforts to build bipartisan support with policymakers.

    While Dunn purported Google’s solutions to be market-based, the company embraces policies that conservatives strongly oppose, such as net neutrality. Suspicions on the right also arise from its former CEO’s close relationship to President Obama.

    “I think one of the things we’ve learned is that no company can get anything done in Washington without partnerships on both sides of the aisle,” said Adam Kovacevich, head of competition public policy and public affairs at Google. “People may not necessarily agree with the politics of some of our executives, that doesn’t mean that philosophy about government regulation on Internet content should be different.”

    The company, however, is attempting to strike a different tone with a Congress that is asking questions about Google’s role in the marketplace. The Senate’s Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommittee held a hearing last week on the issue.

    “They welcome the oversight of the Senate Antitrust Committee and they welcome the FTC investigation,” said Dunn, “but what they want is that the solution be a free-market based approach, including the net neutrality debate.”

    Dunn noted that the net neutrality debate taught Google how Washington works and why it is now advocating a market-based policy approach. James Gattuso, senior research fellow in regulatory policy at The Heritage Foundation, suggested that it is more likely that the Federal Trade Commission’s recent investigation into Google’s search-engine practices are what motivated the company to change its tune.

    Despite its efforts in Washington, there are moments when Google’s actions continue to scare conservatives. Such was the case Monday when Douglas Edwards, former director of consumer marketing and brand management at Google, stood up during Obama’s LinkedIn town hall and said, “Please raise my taxes.”

    “It sometimes pains me as a Republican to see former Google execs standing up and asking to be taxed more,” remarked Dunn, in response to questions about Edwards’ comment.

    Not everyone at The Bloggers Briefing was convinced of Google’s arguments or motives.

    Scott Cleland, author of “Search and Destroy: Why You Can’t Trust Google, Inc.” and a Microsoft consultant, criticized Google’s antitrust legal council, Susan Creighton, when she called the company an exemplar of free market principles.

    Cleland later wrote for Forbes that “Google is engaged in an emergency, politically-expedient, extreme makeover to try and get free market conservatives to rescue Google from their own reckless disregard for the rule of law and for the property and privacy of others.”

    UPDATE: Seton Motley, president of Less Government, asserted at The Bloggers Briefing that Google donated money to MoveOn.org. Google says that’s inaccurate. The company has never donated to the left-wing organization.

    Posted in Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Google Makes a Pitch for Free Market

    1. David says:

      The free market is the most fair system, because the winners win based mostly on merit, rather than a central authority picking the winner. Governments have picked winners in the telecommunications market and, through subsidies, have created regional telecommunications monopolies. The point of net neutrality is to prevent these government-created central authorities from picking the winners on the internet. Right now, winners on the Internet still win by merit, and the point of net neutrality is to preserve that. Why on earth, then, does Heritage oppose net neutrality?

    2. skeeter says:

      Here's an idea. Make it illegal to donate any money at all to any government lackey.
      I do realize, of course, that these bribe….er support funds do not influence those receiving funds in any way. NO one, NO business, NO kidding. hahaha…sounded good, didn't it?

    3. Bobbie says:

      disclaimers immediately necessary on all businesses and advertisements who fail to stand accountable on their own and choose to partner with the burden of abusive government overreach using government's advantage of authority to thieve private tax dollars used for personal interests. DISCLAIMERS!

    4. Seton Motley says:

      Your update is inaccurate. And Mr. Kovacevich is incorrect.

      In 2006, NewsBusters reported:
      http://newsbusters.org/node/5372

      that Google had donated more than $1 million to left-of-center Moveon.org and that Moveon was using the money to fund its operations in Pennsylvania, Florida, Ohio, and Missouri. From the piece:

      "According to sources in the Democrat National Committee, MoveOn has received more than $1 million from Google and its lobbyists in Washington to create grassroots support for the Internet regulation legislation. Some of that money has gone to an online petition drive and a letter-writing campaign, but the majority of that money is being used to fund their activities against Republicans out in the states."

      In 2007, Google was still looking out for MoveOn.org. Writer Michele Malkin then reported:
      http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/11/why-did-goog

      that Google was banning anti-MoveOn.org ads placed by Republican groups – because the use of the name MoveOn.org on anti-MoveOn.org merchandise abused trademark law.

      Since, Google has joined with Verizon to make the Android cell phone – and thusly realized the practical absurdity of Net Neutrality. So MoveOn.org has turned on them.

      MoveOn.org ran an anti-Google petition entitled “Google: Say no to the reported agreement with Verizon to kill Net Neutrality and the open Internet.”
      http://pol.moveon.org/google/

      But the Google coin was given – and the play for pay ensued.

      Seton Motley
      President
      Less Government

    5. Red E says:

      I am curious why Google refuses to recognize Christmas or Easter anymore. I have emailed them to no avail.

    6. Dan Conyers says:

      I wouldn't trust anyone that worked in McCain's camp at first sight. John (both sides of the aisle) McCain does not have a strong conservative stance on the issues, never has. He has disappointed and created doubt in many constituents.
      "“It sometimes pains me as a Republican to see former Google execs standing up and asking to be taxed more,” remarked Dunn…" Why didn't Dunn say "It ALWAYS pains me…"?

      No, hiring Mr. Dunn is just a way to get "in" Washington and learn how to play their games to get what Google wants. No, I just got more scared of Google.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×