• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • China’s Law of the Sea Treaty Double Game

    Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton and former Defense Department official Dan Blumenthal have written an interesting and timely op-ed about China and the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST).

    In “Time to Kill the Law of the Sea Treaty—Again,” the authors describe the duplicitous double game that China plays in the South China Sea by manipulating the provisions of LOST.

    China—which is a member of LOST—is interpreting the treaty’s provision on the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in a manner that prohibits lawful military surveillance activities conducted by the U.S. Navy; at the same time, the Chinese navy engages in military activities within the EEZ of its neighbors in the South China Sea.

    In 2009, Chinese vessels harassed civilian, unarmed U.S. Navy surveillance ships in the South China Sea and the Yellow Sea. Both the USNS Impeccable and the USNS Victorious had been patrolling the area in international waters when Chinese naval vessels and “fishing boats” threatened to collide with them and attempted to damage their towed sonar arrays.

    Ambassador Bolton’s article describes the futility of believing that U.S. membership in LOST would somehow fix everything with China and the South China Sea. What is certain is that U.S. membership in the treaty is not necessary to secure the Navy’s navigational rights and freedoms. What is necessary, as Bolton concludes, is “properly funding and equipping the Navy and exercising it in China’s exclusive zones, including especially on intelligence missions, based on long-established state practice.”

    To the credit of the Obama Administration, in response to the harassment of the Impeccable, it sent in the Aegis destroyer USS Chung-Hoon to escort the surveillance ship during its next mission, proving that when push comes to shove on the high seas, the most effective response is demonstrating our nation’s military capabilities.

    Tensions will continue to rise in the South China Sea as China, Vietnam, the Philippines, and other concerned nations vie to divide up the potentially massive oil and gas resources located there. It would appear that even the Obama Administration has discovered that a show of force—and not membership in a treaty that China does not respect—is the surest way of protecting U.S. navigational rights and freedoms in the South China Sea and around the world.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to China’s Law of the Sea Treaty Double Game

    1. CG-23 Sailor says:

      There is no such thing as an Aegis destroyer. That is a common mistake. It is an Arleigh Burke class destroyer. Aegis is a combat system installed aboard the destroyer and other ship classes as well.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×