• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The U.S. in the Obama Era: Superpower or Doormat?

    Sometimes the writing on the wall is 10 feet tall, and you have to be willfully blind not to see it. The September attack on the U.S. embassy in Kabul on September 13, which has now been linked to Pakistani secret service officials, is surely such an instance.

    Getting attacked by terrorists backed by someone who is supposedly your ally is a new low. As Heritage’s Lisa Curtis correctly remarks, the Obama Administration has to make it absolutely clear that this is a game changer in the Pakistani–U.S. relationship. If not, this great country will look ever weaker in foreign public perception.

    Unfortunately, it is just one of a long line of foreign insults and snubs that the Obama White House seems to have become accustomed to taking from abroad. Being liked more than feared has always been this President’s preferred modus operandi. Unfortunately, his speech to the U.N. General Assembly last week failed on both counts.

    So little respect does the U.S. President now command that the Palestinians could not be dissuaded from their U.N. gambit. And French president Nicolas Sarkozy thought nothing of delivering a resounding repudiation of the American position against U.N. recognition of Palestinian statehood only four speakers after President Obama had spoken from the same podium. This snub would have been inconceivable only a few years ago.

    And as for love—well, here’s what former State Department spokesman P. J. Crowley wrote on the BBC Web site Monday about the Administration’s Middle East policy: “The failure was arriving in New York in the midst of historic and transformational change to deal with a Palestinian request for statehood, and having nothing more to offer than a veto threat.”

    And Crowley bitterly comments regarding Obama’s Cairo speech, striking a theme that Hillary Clinton had hammered in the Democratic primary campaign: “This is a test. Peace is hard. But if the only answer is a veto, then Cairo no longer represents U.S. policy. It was only a speech.”

    Regrettably, “It was only a speech” applies to so much of the Obama Administration’s diplomatic efforts, going back to President Obama’s hapless attempt to secure the 2012 Olympics for his hometown of Chicago in the first months of his presidency. Practically on the spur of the moment, without any adequate preparation, the President and First Lady took off for a lightning-quick visit to Copenhagen, where the Olympic committee was meeting. In spite of the President’s widely admired speech, Chicago did not even make it to the final round of aspirants. The ultimate winner was London, whose officials had been preparing the case for years. The snub to the U.S. President was as predictable as it was self-inflicted. And it was a harbinger of snubs to come.

    It will be the hard but necessary job for the next U.S. President—whoever it may be—to restore the international standing and credibility of the United States. Preserving the nation’s military strength, bolstering its international diplomacy, and using public diplomacy to remind the world of U.S. achievements and clout should all be a part of that task.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to The U.S. in the Obama Era: Superpower or Doormat?

    1. carol,az says:

      Thank You Helle Dale . Your last paragraph summarizes the new age foreign politics by American's White House pet that TV media , albeit Fox News, refuses to acknowledge as an international disaster _I am reminded that his man was awarded the Noble Peace Prize.
      Central to this issue is an ideology that no one can explain for leadership in America, a nation with a short history and unprecedented individual enterprise and exceptionalism.
      To project it on a macro level, you have pointed out, is the same mirror the world also sees, as no leadership here in America.
      Our own Govt continues to brow beat us, denigrate America, apologize for some unseen spectre, and trash nations that have supported us for decades.
      Doormat or Superpower? I think time to take out the trash.

    2. EuroConservative says:

      "And French president Nicolas Sarkozy thought nothing of delivering a resounding repudiation of the American position against U.N. recognition of Palestinian statehood only four speakers after President Obama had spoken from the same podium. This snub would have been inconceivable only a few years ago."

      Why do you think so? It was actually much more conceivable a couple of years ago than it is today. Afetr all. Sarkozy is the most pro-American French president in France's history, and Obama still enjoys high popularity in France.

      I think you are a marxist (like Obama), believing that reality can be changed by simply talking differently. But it's the fundamentals that matter. And America's fundamentals are now weaker than anytime since 1945 and destined to further (relative) weakening.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×