• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama's Tax Plan Raises Price of Nuclear Energy

    Buried deep within the President’s tax plan is a proposal to “reauthorize the special assessment from domestic nuclear utilities.”

    Translation: The President wants to place an additional tax on nuclear utilities that will result in higher energy prices for consumers.

    The United States gets 20 percent of its electricity from nuclear power. So what the President characterizes as a $2 billion “savings” over 10 years is really a $200 million annual price increase for the millions of American consumers who rely on nuclear energy.

    The money would be placed into a special fund that was created in 1992 to pay for the decontamination and decommissioning of the Department of Energy’s old uranium enrichment sites in Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Although these plants were built in the 1940s and 1950s to support national security activities, they were also used later to provide enriched uranium for commercial purposes. Thus, collecting a fee from nuclear utilities to help pay for cleanup costs seems to make sense.

    The problem is that these fees have already been paid—TWICE!

    The first payment came when utilities purchased enrichment services from the U.S. government to begin with. A portion of the price included decontamination and decommissioning costs. But Washington decided that was not adequate, so it charged the utilities again as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992. The 1992 act required that each utility be assessed a fee based on the services it received from government-owned enrichment facilities. Consumers paid more than $2.6 billion in additional costs as a result of the 1992 act. That program ended in 2007, and now President Obama wants to charge consumers a third time.

    The Obama Administration seems to think that the provision of commercial services from these government-owned facilities somehow results in an endless private-sector liability for cleanup costs. It ignores the fact that these facilities were built and owned by the federal government to meet critical national security requirements, not to meet commercial needs.

    Indeed, they have no utility as commercial entities, which is why the Ohio and Tennessee facilities are already shut down, with the Kentucky one ready to go. The private sector is fully capable of providing commercial enrichment services far more efficiently than the government ever could. There is already one enrichment plant on line in New Mexico with plants in Idaho, Ohio, and North Carolina planned. And just as owners of each of these plants must be responsible for decommissioning, so must the U.S. government be for its old plants.

    Charging nuclear energy consumers a fee for something they have already paid for twice is patently unfair. And portraying outstanding cleanup costs as the responsibility of the nuclear industry is disingenuous.

    When it comes to charging America’s electricity consumers for a government mess, the third time is not a charm.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Obama's Tax Plan Raises Price of Nuclear Energy

    1. Todd says:

      Our government does not miss a single trick to levy more taxes on society! Everyone must remember that every corporate or business taxes is simply passed to the consumer in higher prices.

    2. David says:

      This illustrates the very very inexpensive nature of electricity coming from a paid for Nuclear power plant. It also illustrates that there is NO real desire for competition for power, but a deep conviction that power must be expensive rather than cheap. I believe the inexpensive power is the foundation of industry.

    3. TimAZ says:

      No surprise here. Before Mao-Bama was elected he said in his utopia energy prices would necessarily sky rocket. This just proves that there are somethings he will be honest about. Don't forget he also said we are not even half way to achieving Obama Nirvana. Had enough yet?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.