• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Turkish Agreement on Missile Defense—Now the Real Work Begins

    Last week, the Obama Administration made a step toward implementation of the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA), its four-phase ballistic missile defense plan for the protection of allies and friends in the European region. The Turkish foreign ministry announced its decision to host an X-band radar AN/TPY-2 in its territory. This is a welcome step in the development of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) ballistic missile defense capability, which became a core competency of the alliance in November. Data from the radar in Turkey will be integrated with U.S. Navy Aegis missile defense capable cruisers and destroyers deployed in the Mediterranean in support of the EPAA.

    Turkey has been a NATO member since 1952, and it has been one of Washington’s most critical allies in the region ever since. It is situated at the pivotal gateway between Europe, Russia, and the Middle East. The radar will be deployed at the Kurecik military base in Turkey’s Malatya province in the east. The base’s unique location will allow the radar to track ballistic missiles of all ranges launched primarily from the Middle East (especially Iran).

    According to the EPAA’s first phase timeline, the radar should be deployed by the end of the year. Given its transportability, this deadline should not be difficult to meet. It is essential that the schedule is kept on track, since the United States is already failing to keep pace with the advancing ballistic missile threat.

    The AN/TPY-2 radar possesses a unique capability and must be permitted to make the greatest possible contribution to the ballistic missile defense capability of the United States and its friends and allies. This capability has been hampered by steps that the Obama Administration took during its first year in office, when it proposed to cut $1.6 billion from the missile defense budget. In addition, the Administration canceled or curtailed promising U.S. missile defense programs, such as the Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV), the Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), or the Airborne Laser and the ground-based midcourse defense (GMD).

    Whether all phases of the EPAA will be implemented on schedule will be resolved in the coming months and years. In light of the proliferation of threats in today’s uncertain, multipolar world, fielding a comprehensive missile defense must be a priority of the Obama Administration. Another unanswered question is whether the Administration will back off this agreement with Turkey, as it did with Poland and the Czech Republic—to make arms control agreements with Russia.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Turkish Agreement on Missile Defense—Now the Real Work Begins

    1. clint says:

      Oh cool! So you Heritage people support the radar in Turkey? Cause last I checked Senator Kyl does not because Turkey will not share data with Israel. (As if Israel's problems are the US's).

      So Heritage disagrees with Senator Kyl and agrees with President Obama on the Turkish radar site for the EPAA?

    2. Rick says:

      Good question from Clint — who is right Kyl or Obama? Should we let Turkey have the radar or put it in Georgia or Israel which are not NATO members?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×