• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • CNN "Fact-Checks" Opinions

    During the Republican debate Monday night in Tampa, Florida, Governor Rick Perry (R–TX) said that President Obama’s $800 billion stimulus created zero jobs. CNN “fact-checked” this statement and determined it was false.

    To review, in 2009 just before the stimulus was enacted, the unemployment rate stood at 7.5 percent. Today—two years after the unprecedented spending experiment—the unemployment rate is 9.1 percent. In fact, 1.7 million fewer Americans are working today than were employed when the stimulus was enacted.

    Nevertheless, CNN decided that because the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and other private forecasters claim that the stimulus created millions of jobs, it must be fact. According to CNN’s Tom Foreman:

    So, in a nutshell, what the governor is saying is that the stimulus created zero jobs. But the Congressional Budget Office, which is very trusted here, says that’s just not the case. They say it’s between 1.4 and 3.3 million jobs were either created or saved by the stimulus program.

    I realize that sounds squishy, because it’s a very broad range. But many independent economists also say there’s no question that jobs were created or protected by the stimulus spending. So as much as the governor would like to say his statement is true, when we look at it, we have to say, no, that is flat-out false. The stimulus did create some jobs, maybe not as many as they wanted, but it did create jobs.

    CNN completely ignores, however, that the CBO arrives at its conclusion because of the opinions it inputs into its model. For example, rather than observing the actual economy, its economic models assume their own conclusion: The model simply inputs predetermined numbers into a formula and spits out a number of jobs that the stimulus (the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or ARRA) created. That’s the only way the evaluation can be done. As the CBO explains:

    Although CBO has examined data on output and employment during the period since ARRA’s enactment, those data are not as helpful in determining ARRA’s economic effects as might be supposed because isolating the effects would require knowing what path the economy would have taken in the absence of the law. Because that path cannot be observed, the new data add only limited information about ARRA’s impact.

    Thus, the very question of whether or not the stimulus created jobs depends upon one’s assumptions about the economy. And economists disagree on those assumptions.

    For instance, Heritage economists as well as others (John Cochrane and Eugene Fama of the University of Chicago, for example) disagree with the CBO’s assumption that a dollar of government spending creates more than a dollar of total national income (the “multiplier effect”). That notion assumes that the government can inject new dollars — or unutilized dollars – into the economy, ignoring that government must first remove those dollars from the economy. Unless the government prints stimulus dollars (which it didn’t under the 2009 stimulus), the money has to come from somewhere.

    Rather than declaring the CBO’s position as fact and accusing Perry of making false claims, it would have been appropriate for CNN to state that though the CBO and many private forecasters say the stimulus created jobs, some economists disagree and insist that Perry is in fact correct that it did create zero net jobs.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to CNN "Fact-Checks" Opinions

    1. West Texan says:

      I'm sure Wolf Blitzer and CNN felt they were doing Perry a humongous favor by allowing him on stage. Of course they're going to highlight any damaging nugget they can conger-up against Perry. Today's self-engrossed media supports their ideological subjectivity with big government's social progressive playbook of skewed numbers. Leftist have never learned to pull their head out of the cockpit and look around. That's why our country is completely off course and headed straight for the ground.

      When discussing social entitlement reforms, most candidates never answered the larger question. And that's federalism's dual sovereign role. Social issues are entirely states' business. A few came close, especially Ron Paul. The big problem with him is his simplistic Neville Chamberlain approach to foreign policy.

    2. @USAGeorge says:

      So what else would one expect from CNN? I knew they were blowing smoke before I read this._ I always expect a certain slant from any news source….The news reporting as a whole has gone_gutter rat. Today they all breeze over the reporting and spend the majority of their time giving their slant,_their political views,their polotical wants. Frankly I just want them to report the news,and shut their collective yaps on their views……………

    3. ted says:

      So what can you believe in the news anymore? All news, all stations are controlled by FCC, that should show you something.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.