• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Michigan Takes on Welfare Reform

    In the national effort to overcome dependence on government, Michigan has just moved one step forward toward ensuring that welfare promotes self-reliance.

    On Tuesday, Governor Rick Snyder (R) signed legislation to place a four-year time limit on cash assistance benefits for welfare recipients.

    In 2006, Michigan passed similar legislation under then-Governor Jennifer Granholm (D). But, according to Jack McHugh of Michigan’s Mackinac Center, that particular legislation included so many loopholes that it rendered the time limits practically meaningless. The legislation signed this week attempts strengthen the time limits and thus promote personal responsibility.

    Snyder noted that “we are returning cash assistance to its original intent as a transitional program to help families while they work toward self-sufficiency.”

    Similarly, Maura Corrigan, Michigan’s Health and Human Services director, stated:

    We cannot afford to provide lifetime cash assistance to recipients who are able to work. Enforcing lifetime limits for cash assistance ensures that available funds are targeted toward those recipients who need a helping hand while they find employment.

    In 1996, the federal government took similar steps to reform welfare by creating the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program in place of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). Whereas the average stay on AFDC was 13 years, TANF inserted a five-year time limit for able-bodied recipients and also required that individuals work or look for work.

    As a result of the reforms, millions of families left welfare for jobs. Furthermore, the poverty rate among African-American children dropped to an all-time low.

    Unfortunately, some of TANF’s success has been eroded. Over the years, Senate Democrats have blocked reauthorization of the reform law, and states have used loopholes to evade work provisions. Beyond this, TANF is only one part of a behemoth federal welfare system that is now composed of over 70 different programs. Today, total welfare spending edges near $1 trillion annually, a 13-fold increase since the War on Poverty began in the 1960s.

    By implementing stricter time limits, Michigan is taking a step forward to ensure that assistance remains a temporary help to families in need rather than a tool for creating dependence.

    The federal government should take similar action to ensure that federal welfare programs encourage personal responsibility by promoting work. Furthermore, the government should get welfare spending under control rather than calling for ever-increasing funds. Finally, federal, state, and local governments should promote strong marriage—the greatest prevention to poverty—by eliminating marriage penalties present in many welfare programs and encouraging marriage among low-income communities.

    A prosperous nation consists of citizens who are self-reliant. Any program that aims to assist should therefore promote personal responsibility.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Michigan Takes on Welfare Reform

    1. Charles Kyriacou says:

      Is New York Listening? The problem with this situation is, the Democrats use wellfare programs to control people and get their votes. They couldn't care less about these people, they just use them.

    2. Mason Dickson says:

      In 1964 Lyndon B Johnson's Great Society initiative did nothing to solve the problem. It did much to break down the family structure. This was very obvious when you saw five generations fleeing the results of Kartina. It was rare to see a male among the group.

      Thanks, Governor Snyder for working on this.

    3. Cheri says:

      Amen! It's about time. Good for Michigan! I hope this sets a precedent for other states.

    4. peter john says:

      I have no problem with a time limit for single health adults without menatl issues as long as there is a program to help them make the transition. One of problem with these programs is that it starts out reasonable then conservatives have to make it worse and worse and before you know it there are children homeless and starving. And children starving can never be allowed.

    5. Jessica says:

      Finally! I don't mind helping (which is what it is there for) but why should I work my butt off so they can stay home their whole lives and live off of the government!?

    6. Ellsworth says:

      Seems like heritage is talking out of both sides of their mouth
      http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2007/

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×