• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Drone Strikes Protect America from al-Qaeda's Terror

    In another major blow to al-Qaeda, a U.S. drone strike last Monday in the North Waziristan tribal area of Pakistan killed the organization’s new number two commander, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman. The successful strike demonstrates the importance of continuing the drone missile campaign along Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan as a cornerstone of the mission to degrade and eventually defeat al-Qaeda.

    Pakistani officials and media outlets regularly criticize the drone missile strikes as a violation of Pakistani sovereignty. But the U.S. is highly unlikely to relent in its drone campaign since the tactic has proven to be the most effective tool for the U.S. to destroy al-Qaeda’s leadership and disrupt its ability to plot and train for attacks across the globe.

    Al-Rahman, a Libyan national, had risen to al-Qaeda’s number two spot following the elimination of Osama bin Laden on May 2. In addition to serving as the primary liaison to al-Qaeda’s organizational networks in Iraq and Iran, al-Rahman had bolstered al-Qaeda’s position in Algeria by helping form al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.

    The elimination of al-Rahman—a central operational planner for the organization—is another sign that al-Qaeda is weakening. Al-Rahman had directed American terrorist Bryant Neal Vinas, who helped al-Qaeda with a plot to bomb the New York City subway in 2009. Al-Rahman had also directed terrorist plots in Europe and played a role in the suicide bombing that killed seven CIA operatives in Afghanistan in December 2009.

    Files captured at bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound apparently revealed that bin Laden and al-Rahman had discussed trying to broker a deal with Pakistani authorities for al-Qaeda to receive protection in Pakistan in exchange for its agreement to refrain from mounting attacks inside Pakistan. While there are no indications that such a plan was ever muted with Pakistani officials, the revelation shows that al-Qaeda operatives perceive vulnerabilities among Pakistan’s leadership that they can exploit to their advantage.

    While the U.S. has made tremendous strides against al-Qaeda in the last 18 months, culminating in the death of bin Laden in May, it will not be able to finish the job of defeating the organization altogether without full Pakistani cooperation.

    Pakistani officials have long tolerated terrorist groups that are linked to al-Qaeda, which in turn facilitate the organization’s ability to use Pakistan as a launch pad for its international terrorist campaign. Pakistani officials have sought to argue that they can “better control” or “keep tabs on” the terrorist groups if their intelligence agencies retain links to them. However, if such groups were able to protect the world’s most wanted terrorist without the Pakistan military’s knowledge, who is keeping tabs on whom?

    As the Heritage Foundation Counterterrorism Task Force has argued in its August 24 report, U.S. officials should reject Pakistani assertions that they are incapable of shutting down groups linked to al-Qaeda, such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba, which is responsible for the 2008 Mumbai terror attack, and the Harakat-ul-Mujahideen, whose leader was in contact with bin Laden’s courier before the May 2 raid.

    Indeed, the U.S. should never settle for Pakistani excuses for avoiding a full-throttle approach against these terrorist groups and instead demand that Pakistan be accountable for the activities of all terrorist groups on its soil.

    Despite the severe differences between Islamabad and Washington over terrorism, it is in the interest of the U.S. to remain engaged with Pakistani leaders and demonstrate U.S. interest in the development of a prosperous and moderate Pakistan free of the terrorist scourge. Pakistani leaders are slowly waking to the costs of tolerating terrorism on their soil, and the U.S. should be in a position to support the state against the terrorists’ designs.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Drone Strikes Protect America from al-Qaeda's Terror

    1. allen says:

      America's Number One Hit Man. "Debt Man Walking Obama"

    2. snydrhrry says:

      Pakistan is playing both sides of the street. China is growing. The U.S. is not, in fact may be shrinking, in power and capability vis-a-vis China. So it is not surprising that Pakistan is not working with the United States to ferret out terrorist gangs.

    3. Juan Martinez says:

      Allen, I'm a little confused by your comment. But, you must admit, love him or hate him, Obama's decision to send Seal Team Six to get bin Laden and walk away with an intelligence treasure trove was a good one — it's probably made more of a difference in the war against Al Qaeda than years of constitution violating torture of captives. And he's had the courage to routinely violate Pakistan's sovereignty claims with effective drone strikes. Not all bad, eh?

      • Bobbie says:

        treasure trove? what honest gesture has obama made before or after, that reflects ANY of America's values of freedom and liberty or any respect of AMERICANS that are accustomed to living those values? This one act is suppose to make up for government acts of communism, socialism, that is in direct opposition to America's people, values, principles?

        That treasure trove was confiscated by China, Juan. You sure have low expectations of this President!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×