• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Celebrating Steve Jobs' Failures?

    An iPad displays a picture of Apple CEO Steve Jobs

    An iPad displays a picture of Steve Jobs at an Apple store in Hangzhou, east China's Zhejiang Province, Aug. 25, 2011. Steve Jobs has resigned as the chief executive officer (CEO) of Apple, the company said on Wednesday. (/Long Wei)

    Listen to your music on an iPod? Read news on an iPad? Cherish your beautifully minimalist iMac? Then you’ve benefited from the genius of Apple Inc.’s Steve Jobs.

    With the news this week of his decision to step down as CEO of the company, many have lauded his incredible successes in changing the way the world uses computers, consumes entertainment, and uses the Internet. But less has been said about the importance of his failures, the lessons Jobs learned, and what that can teach us about the free market.

    Nick Schulz of the American Enterprise Institute explains:

    Jobs failed better than anyone else in Silicon Valley, maybe better than anyone in corporate America. By that I mean Jobs did what only the greatest entrepreneurs can do: learn from their failures. I don’t mean learn from their mistakes. I mean learn from their abject, humiliating, bonehead, epic fails.

    Jobs (along with Steve Wozniak) brought us the Apple I and Apple II computers, early iterations of which sold in the mere hundreds and were complete failures. Not until the floppy disk was introduced and sufficient RAM added did the Apple II take off as a successful product.

    Jobs was the architect of Lisa, introduced in the early 1980s. You remember Lisa, don’t you? Of course you don’t. But this computer — which cost tens of millions of dollars to develop — was another epic fail. Shortly after Lisa, Apple had a success with its Macintosh computer. But Jobs was out of a job by then, having been tossed aside thanks to the Lisa fiasco.

    Later, Jobs rejoined Apple Computers and went to work making the incredible products that have changed the way the world works today. Schulz explains that it was only by failing that Jobs learned how to create the products that the world didn’t even know it wanted—and then make billions from it.

    But for all the things Jobs invented, he doesn’t hold the patent on failure. Henry Ford‘s first automobile company went bankrupt because of high prices and low quality, he left his second company after a falling out with a consultant, and the Ford Motor Co. we know today almost didn’t make it off the ground. Walt Disney‘s first foray into cartooning ended up in defeat—he couldn’t get work as an artist at a newspaper—and his early “Laugh-O-Gram” cartoon studio wound up bankrupt. It took Disney’s losing the rights to his character “Oswald the Lucky Rabbit” (along with most of his animation staff) for Mickey Mouse to be born, and the rest is history.

    The list of entrepreneurs who took risks, suffered failures, and picked themselves up again is long and distinguished. Their names include the likes of Thomas Edison and R.H. Macy, Bill Gates and the Wright Brothers. It was from their failures that success was born—and it was in the free market that they made it big. Unfortunately, today that system is under assault. David Newton, a professor of entrepreneurial finance, and Andrew Puzder, CEO of CKE Restaurants, write in their book Job Creation that the growth of government is constraining the type of entrepreneurship that our free-market system should otherwise promote:

    Virtually every large business enterprise, including McDonalds, Coca Cola, Microsoft, Apple, Ford, and Wal-Mart started with an idea or a product under the most humble of circumstances driven by individuals unrestrained by either an oppressive class structure or pervasive government control.

    Ironically, in recent years the greatest threat to this phenomenally successful system for generating economic growth and prosperity has become the very government the framers created to facilitate free enterprise and to regulate attempts to make it less free.

    Amid today’s high unemployment, many are turning to expanded government spending as the answer for creating more jobs. And they’re looking for government support to prop up industries and create new ones. But Jobs and others like him found great success only after taking great risks in a free market where they have been allowed to thrive—or fail—without too much government interference. If America wants more entrepreneurs to emerge, more people to take risks, and more jobs to be created, then the government should stand back and let the brightest minds get to work.

    Posted in Featured, Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Celebrating Steve Jobs' Failures?

    1. DREGstudios says:

      Jobs is done but left his mark on every corner of wireless technology. It only leaves us asking who won the war between the two titans of modern computer technology? Steve Jobs vs. Bill Gates / Apple vs. Microsoft– check out my rendering of an epic match-up of their cyborg selves on my artist's blog at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/08/end-of

    2. Great article to remind us to take risks — despite whatever has come our way in the past. The future is yet to be written and may very well be the best thing for us, and our country.

    3. Outstanding article! Well done!!

    4. JoelD says:

      Yes! Failures are essential. Take the risk, learn from the failure, earn the reward. Too many people are wimps because they've been protected from failure. The only thing a person who is insulated from failure can aspire to be is a Democrat President.

    5. Doug Kuhlmann says:

      Given the number of start ups that continue to be created, can the author give 2 or 3 concrete examples of how the government has stifled entrepreneurs.

    6. allen says:

      "GOOD JOB"

    7. Bobbie says:

      challenge is good and America was great for allowing it!! Americans that took that challenge didn't need any bailouts or hand holdings of government!!! NO AL GORES OR JOE BIDENS NECESSARY!!!!!! the only difference IS today's government interference and their authoritative abuse.

      Personal intellect!!!!!! challenge and risks ARE lifes experiences in freedom!! WAS in America!!!

      Today the federal government legislates challenges and risks so we can be fully protected from both with no need to take!!!!!!! THE MORE GOVERNMENT THE LESS FREEDOM!!!!!

      we have much to be grateful for regarding Steve Jobs and the like who's jobs given to us kept us free to provide and live for ourselves…

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.