• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Is the U.S. Defense Industrial Base Past the Turning Point?

    At the 2011 Space and Missile Defense Conference in Huntsville, Alabama, one could sense increasing concerns from engineers and scientists who support and contribute to the U.S. defense industrial base. The U.S. defense industrial base put a man on the moon, allowed the country to win the Cold War, and developed numerous technologies Americans use in everyday life. The type of education and advanced skill sets these men and women possess are invaluable to national security and the U.S. economy. These resources, once lost, would be difficult, expensive, and time-consuming to rebuild.

    The defense industrial base is already being challenged, and budget cuts and advancing threats are only making things worse. Recently the House of Representatives voted on the Budget Control Act of 2011. In the first batch of cuts totaling nearly $1 trillion, the bill caps security spending in fiscal year 2012 at $684 billion and in FY 2013 at $686 billion.

    Specifically, the U.S. solid rocket industrial base is already being jeopardized, in part by the lack of commitment on the part of the current Administration to modernize the country’s strategic missile forces. This stems from a lack of clarity on future plans to develop nuclear and non-nuclear strategic weapons. For example, consider the average age of two types of missiles: A Minuteman III ICBM is 40 years, and the average age of a Trident II D–5 SLBM is 20 years. It is imperative for the U.S. to maintain effective strategic missile forces indefinitely.

    In addition, the U.S. needs to preserve its military, civilian, and commercial space capabilities. America should develop, acquire, and operate space systems to support national security and respond to changes in the threat environment.

    To maintain the ability and flexibility of the U.S. to respond to advancing threats, the United States needs to invest in the current and future defense industrial base. By encouraging more industrial competition, Washington can play a positive role in revitalizing the U.S. defense industrial base, boosting jobs and exports, building the capacity of friends and allies, lowering costs for Pentagon acquisition, and ensuring the nation retains this essential foundation for national security.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×