• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • United in Countering the Ballistic Missile Threat

    Participants in the annual Space and Missile Defense Conference in Huntsville, AL, have a shared goal: protect the U.S. homeland, forward-deployed troops, and allies from a ballistic missile threat. The current fiscal environment and missile defense policies of the Obama Administration make this task ever more difficult.

    The most recent debt ceiling bill, unless repealed, will severely compromise U.S. national security. The law establishes a goal of reducing federal deficits by $1.5 trillion, while requiring automatic spending reductions of $1.2 trillion if the goal is not met. In the latter case, half of the automatic spending reductions would have to come out of the defense account. This means about $600 billion would have to be cut from whatever figure applies to the defense account at that time. These reductions would irreparably harm the U.S. military and strip it of its ability to secure vital U.S. interests. Reductions might irreparably harm missile defense programs.

    In addition, the Obama Administration has made massive cuts in the missile defense programs, cancelled promising programs (the Airborne Laser, the Multiple Kill Vehicle), disappointed allies by pulling out of joint programs (the Medium Extended Air Defense System, cancellation of a radar in the Czech Republic and two-stage Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Interceptors in Poland), and negotiated a New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) with Russia. The treaty imposes sweeping restrictions on U.S. missile defense options.

    The threat is real, as more than 30 countries all over the world possess ballistic missile capabilities. Some of these countries, e.g. Iran and North Korea, have interests contrary to those of the United States. Both Iran and North Korea have nuclear weapons programs and an ability to reach U.S. allies and forward-deployed troops with their ballistic missiles. North Korea has the ballistic missile capability to reach Hawaii and Alaska. This is not the time to cut missile defense spending; this is the time to provide for the common defense—the primary obligation of the government.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to United in Countering the Ballistic Missile Threat

    1. roger says:

      Well, that is sweet. Too bad it is not logical.

      Yes, the threat is real. But your proposed solution of wasting more taxpayer money on MIDCOURSE missile defense is not a sensible solution to that alleged threat. Why? Because even the CIA has said that NK and Iran could field decoys and countermeasures by the time they flight test their missiles.

      So you (may) have gotten the right problem. Congratulations. But you got the wrong solution.

      I am 100% with Ron Paul on this: save the money for projects that work and stop sending the US government abroad annoying people around the world.

      God knows, the US government annoys its own people enough….

    2. clint says:

      You may wish to check your facts: Iran does NOT have a nuclear weapons program. Our own Director of National Intelligence said so:
      http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MH16Ak03.htm

    3. Bobbie says:

      I didn't know the President's listening tour bus could launch??!!!!!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×