• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Gingrich Outlines Objections to 'Super Committee' at Heritage Event

    Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich on Tuesday outlined what he believes are the major problems with the congressional “Super Committee” that will devise a deal to cut the federal budget in the coming months.

    Gingrich, speaking at the Heritage Foundation, broke the problems down into three categories: constitutional, intellectual, and legislative issues.

    The committee, which was created by the debt limit deal struck by congressional leaders early this month, must submit a proposal that cuts at least $1.2 trillion from the budget by November 23.

    “Constitutionally,” Gingrich said, “I think this is a truly bad idea.” The legislative power of both the House and Senate will be distilled into a committee of 12, he noted, thereby diminishing the representation of every American who is not a constituent of one of those 12. Journalists and lobbyists will focus on the Super Committee, he noted, while the other 523 Senators and Representatives are either prevented from meaningfully taking part in the process, or given a convenient excuse to do nothing on the debt issue.

    The underlying problem in American government, Gingrich continued, is an intellectual one. While the Super Committee is “engaged in an ideological fight – tax increase, or no tax increase,” Gingrich said, the private sector is developing innovative ways to do more with less. He specifically lauded – and repeatedly came back to – a management strategy called Lean Six Sigma, which he insisted could save the federal government $150 billion per year if used as a model.

    Gingrich summed up the Super Committee’s approach to the federal budget thusly:

    This is a city that says, “well, we’d really like to do better, but we can’t do any better so we’re going to have to do less of what we’re doing or we have to raise taxes. Since you don’t want us to do less of what we’re currently doing, we have to raise taxes, because after all you can’t expect us to change, so we’re going to expect you to change so you can pay the taxes we’re going to demand of you. But you can’t expect your government to change.”

    “I think they’ve been going at it exactly backwards,” Gingrich said of the Super Committee’s legislative approach. “When you centralize into grand bargains, you maximize the ideological conflict.” Rather than a “grand bargain,” he suggested, Congress should look to implement numerous “small, smart things.” Doing so would allow partisans on both sides to find common ground on smaller proposals, rather than waging full scale ideological battle on large, overarching pieces of legislation.

    One such bill is a Democrat-backed measure in the Senate to allow offshore oil drilling off the coast of Virginia, and use the increased royalty payments to repair infrastructure in the state. Scribe’s Rob Bluey elaborated more on that proposal in a post earlier today.

    Check out Gingrich’s full appearance at Heritage below:

    Video streaming by Ustream

    Posted in Featured, Ongoing Priorities, Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Gingrich Outlines Objections to 'Super Committee' at Heritage Event

    1. Lynn S. Whitney says:

      I have never heard Mr. Gingrich speak before. I am impressed. Sense in an era of unfettered sensibility! I vote for him for our next president.

    2. ROO in COS says:

      I appreciate hearing Newt Gingrich's comments on the "Super" committee, and hope that Congress hears it too. It is encouraging to hear someone in Politics express concerns over the lose of representation the "Super" committee poses to our rights as citizens "the People". Mr. Gingrich's suggestion that Lean 6-sigma is applied to how our government operates was a revolation to me, so I appreciate his introduction of these thoughts here. I hope everyone got a copy of the speech, so they won't get it wrong! :^)
      Thanks Heritage for providing this discussion!

    3. Bobbie says:

      This right here: "Rather than a “grand bargain,” he suggested, Congress should look to implement numerous “small, smart things." leads me to suspect an inching of socialism, etc.? This country needs respectful government who can accept and stay out of the livelihoods of Americans and personal freedom! If some people would rather live under socialism, they can hand over THEIR paychecks and foot THEIR own government dependency bill! We want what this country gives!!!! FREEDOM!!!!! And we don't want it taken advantage of by those who give up their self reliance to dependent on government!!!!

    4. Bobbie says:

      doggone it. I meant: taken advantage of by those who give up OR don't take on their self reliance to DEPEND on government!!!!

    5. Renaus says:

      Mr. Gringrich has ideas that sound very appealling. I hear NO IDEAS from other candidates, including the president. He speaks of smaller government and freedom from intervention from the government.
      I don't know about anyone else but Mr. Gingrich certainly has my vote for president of the U.S.

      • chiuk says:

        Mr. Gingrich eloquent speech sound good to hear but problem is his intellectual ability trumps his common sense solution to solve the nation's deficit. He did not. Come up with a single idea. Rather 'intellectaul view points

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.