• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Russian Threats a Heavy Blow to Obama’s "Reset" Policy

    The U.S. State Department appears to be preempting and diluting the Senate’s Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2011 (S. 1039) by placing some Russian officials on a visa blacklist.

    Last week, the State Department placed some 64 Russian officials on a visa blacklist that would prevent them from entering the United States. These Russian prosecutors and policemen all played a role in the death of lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, the most famous whistleblower in post-communist Russian history.

    Moscow’s position is as revealing as it is mind-boggling: It is ready to endanger the carefully constructed cooperation between U.S. and Russia in areas ranging from arms control to Afghanistan and Iran in order to protect a handful of corrupt police investigators and their high-ranking bosses who apparently stole hundreds of millions of dollars from the Russian state.

    While the Russian Foreign Ministry loudly protests that the U.S. is being tough on Russia, the imposition of U.S. sanctions looks more like the State Department’s effort to prevent the Senate initiative and to save President Obama’s “reset” policy.

    Russia has threatened to “respond asymmetrically” if the Magnitsky bill becomes law. In a tit-for-tat, President Dmitry Medvedev reportedly instructed the Foreign Ministry to draw up a list of U.S. officials who would be banned from Russia and prevented from banking there. These include prosecutors and other law enforcement officials working on cases of the arms dealer Victor Boot, who is accused of supplying weapons to terrorists, and pilot Konstantin Yaroshenko, who smuggled weapons and drugs and was nabbed by the U.S. in Africa.

    Russian diplomacy now appears to fly cover for suspected organized criminals.

    Much more serious are Russian threats to curb cooperation on Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, and North Korea. If implemented, this would be the end of the reset.

    The Obama Administration is clearly worried that inconvenient pressure from Congress is infuriating the Russians. It sure looks that it does. However, if the reset policy is truly based on mutual interests between Russia and the U.S., then cleaning the Augean stables of Russian corruption and criminality should not derail it.

    Yet Moscow’s angry and overblown reaction to the visa ban against suspected criminals working for the Russian state clearly demonstrates its priorities and exposes its anti-Americanism. As Freedom House President and the former Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights in the George W. Bush Administration David Kramer points out in a recent congressional hearing, if Russia is willing to hold back the reset solely based on the Magnitsky case, then the U.S. needs “to reexamine the relationship.”

    So why is the State Department treating the Senate as an irritant? Unlike the Senate, the State Department did not implement asset freezes on questionable Russian officials. Foggy Bottom is against the Magnitsky bill and is campaigning for its defeat. However, according to Kramer, the bill has been integral in keeping the pressure on Russia and has “done more for the cause of human rights [in Russia] than anything done” by the two previous Administrations.

    The U.S. policy toward Russia and other market authoritarians should be a balance of protecting American national interests and upholding American values. The cause of Sergei Magnitsky does that. The flagging “reset” policy does not.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Russian Threats a Heavy Blow to Obama’s "Reset" Policy

    1. Wit says:

      The U.S. has no right to distribute any of its legal standards on other countries. Moscow's response on this is absolutely normal. In Russia, all of which laws are still on Russia taking the U.S. Congress, Russia in no way dependent on the U.S..

    2. Andor says:

      ""Yet Moscow’s angry and overblown reaction to the visa ban against ___suspected___ criminals""
      US is PRESUMABLY a country ruled by LAW. And the law abides by the PRESUMPTION of INNOCENCE. The burden of proof is the responsibility of the accuser.
      Your loud and obnoxious "Trial by media and the Congress" deserves the harsh reaction by Russia. Left unchecked it might escalate into another Witch Hunt.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.