• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Wall Street Journal Exposes Federal Overcriminalization

    Aspiring inventor Krister Evertson received a two-year sentence for allegedly abandoning materials that he had stored in sealed, stainless-steel containers, thus doing no harm to the environment.  Indianapolis 500 champion Bobby Unser was prosecuted and convicted because federal prosecutors estimated that he and his snowmobiling companion wandered into a national wilderness area when they were fighting for their very lives, stranded for 2 days in a Rocky Mountain high-country blizzard.  And federal officials prosecuted and convicted two arrowhead-collecting hobbyists, 66-year-old Eddie Leroy Anderson and his son, who unsuccessfully spent time looking for arrowheads.  Unfortunately for the Andersons, it is a crime (one of the tens of thousands of federal criminal offenses on the books) even to attempt to remove “archaeological resources” from public lands.

    These are some of the shocking real-life stories featured in a must-read Wall Street Journal investigative article on the growing problem of overcriminalization.  The article sounds an alarm for all Americans, who should be concerned that average, hard-working citizens who have no intention of breaking the law are being convicted based on poorly-drafted laws criminalizing conduct that almost no one would suspect is illegal.

    The Journal chronicles several cases similar to the Andersons’ and makes it quite clear that the laws under which these Americans were prosecuted and punished are not anomalies.

    “The Andersons are two of the hundreds of thousands of Americans to be charged and convicted in recent decades under federal criminal laws – as opposed to state or local laws – as the federal system has dramatically expanded its authority and reach.”

    Theoretically, sheer numbers alone might not be a problem.  But “[a]s federal criminal statutes have ballooned, it has become increasingly easy for Americans to end up on the wrong side of the law.”

    Based in part on a Heritage Foundation report by law professor John S. Baker, Jr., the Journal states that the number of federal criminal laws exploded from dozens at the beginning of the 20th century to over 4,500 today.  And this does not include a count of the crimes in federal regulations.  Citing a Department of Justice spokeswoman, the article reports that the total number of federal crimes is so large that it cannot be quantified.

    But it is not just the raw numbers: The worst problem with a large percentage of these criminal laws is that they are flawed.  For example, far too many “don’t require prosecutors to prove criminal intent, eroding a bedrock principle in English and American law.”  Laws with this flaw “set a lower bar for conviction than in the past.”   Further, the Journal points out that many federal criminal laws duplicate existing state laws governing the same conduct, and many cover matters that should be addressed only by a civil penalty, if at all.

    Disappointingly, despite the abuses documented by the Journal (and several others), the Justice Department officials interviewed for the article seem to have defended every example of overcriminalization about which they were questioned.  Given the sorry state of federal criminal law, this leads one to wonder who at the Justice Department’s helm is focused on increasing justice rather than maximizing convictions.

    The WSJ does points out a couple of bright spots.  One is that a few of the nation’s leading jurists are beginning to reexamine and rein in the problems of overcriminalization.  Supreme Court Justices Alito, Kennedy, and Scalia have questioned the seemingly unlimited expanse, and unprincipled expansion, of certain federal criminal laws or enforcement practices.  So have judges in the lower federal courts such as Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski, Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner, and United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Lewis Kaplan.

    The other bright spot the Journal identifies is that a broad range of individuals and organizations are now fighting overcriminalization.  Heritage’s Ed Meese is a key leader of these efforts, but the leaders also include scholars and advocates at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Cato Institute, and ACLU.  We all should be grateful, for as Cato’s Tim Lynch is quoted as saying, Americans are just “one misstep away from the nightmare of a federal indictment.”

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Wall Street Journal Exposes Federal Overcriminalization

    1. Pingback: Wall Street Journal Exposes Federal Overcriminalization | Williams Tea Party

    2. @RCMillsJr says:

      The arrowhead article you link to, to back up your claim that the two guys "unsuccessfully spent time looking for arrowheads" actually says "Anderson and Anderson said they went to the Salmon River Canyon and dug several holes, sifted soil, and found the arrowheads." So which is it "unsuccessfully" or "found the arrowheads"?
      So you support people being able to remove un replaceable historic or archeological artifacts from government property? I guess you will have no problem if I dig a few holes at the Gettysburg battlefield looking for some cool war artifacts.

      Per the Krister Evertson incident. You fail to also mention the 20 metric tons of sodium metal that he improperly transported across two states. http://1.usa.gov/okeUaa . And you fail to point out if sodium metal comes into contact with water at room temperature IT WILL EXPLODE and produce caustic sodium hydroxide and hydrogen gas. Do we really want someone selling the makeins for a water sodium bomb on ebay? really? This man stupidity is dangerous and he belongs in jail.

      The best case is the Bobby Unser one, But still he violated the law by the unlawful operation of a snowmobile within a National Forest Wilderness Area. maybe he should stick to driving some where where he only has to turn left, maybe he won't get lost.

      You need to protect our federal public lands from people who damage and destroy them trying to pilfer artifacts and our nations treasures. And Evertson should be locked up he is a danger to the public if he does not understand the dangers of the materials he is playing with. How can you defend these guys? the first were stealing our nation's treasures and the second is a danger to the general public.

      • OvercrimIsReal says:

        No one ever proved that Bobby Unser was actually in a wilderness area. They never found the snowmobile, thus the feds' charges were bogus (and bordering on entrapment how they pretended to "help" Unser). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfR4PLNdr_c

        Overcriminalization is a real problem every American should be concerned about. Over 4,500 criminal laws? You've probably violated a few today, without even knowing it.

        • @RCMillsJr says:

          I am not really arguing Overcriminalization, but how the WSJ and Heritage are playing fast and loose with the facts. The first two stories in this article are not reported accurately and the people in them did commit crimes and they are things that should be crimes.

    3. Bobbie says:

      as a hobbit in the eyes of the wall street journal, it's hard to appreciate their work…

    4. Pingback: Overcriminalization: You May be the Next Felon! « American Elephants

    5. UADC says:

      There are four main purposes of the Criminal Justice System:
      1. retribution
      2. rehabilitation
      3. restitution
      4. deterrence

      Bob Shearer (Bachelors degree in history, Bachelors degree in Political Science, Law Degree from University of South Carolina, Studied European History and Political Science at Wilhelm University in Germany, Masters Degree in Divinity, President of Kingdom Business Inc. which is a marketplace consultant group. Received five air medals after the Vietnam War, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, and flew President Nixon to Moscow in 1972.)

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.