• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Farewell, Atlantis: China Takes Up the Torch of Manned Space Flight

    With the safe return of the Space Shuttle Atlantis, American ability to put astronauts into space come to an end—50 years after Alan Shepard piloted Freedom 7 into the heavens and became the first American to enter outer space.

    Later this year, China will remind the world that it remains committed to what the United States no longer seems interested in—being able to put a man in space. The Chinese are expected to place the Tiangong–1, resembling the U.S. Skylab or the Soviet Salyut space labs, into orbit sometime later this summer or this fall. The Chinese will also launch an unmanned version of their Shenzhou space capsule to engage in unmanned docking maneuvers with the Tiangong, while preparing for manned missions in 2012 or 2013.

    Meanwhile, China also continues its Chang’e lunar exploration program. With the successful launch of two orbiters, China has now had a chance to examine the moon for the best place to land a lunar rover, currently scheduled for 2013, and eventually a lunar sample retrieval mission, which is expected by 2017. Once that milestone is achieved, China will have completed the two main preparatory steps toward a manned lunar mission, most likely in the 2025 timeframe.

    Some would argue that none of this matters. The U.S. put a man in space in 1961. China’s first manned mission, Shenzhou V, was launched in 2003. The U.S. put a man on the moon on July 20, 1969. China will merely be following in American footsteps.

    Yet the psychological impact of China’s landing a man on the moon will be enormous for three audiences:

    • In China. A Chinese manned mission to the moon will show China (and the world) that the past 200 years or so, when China has consistently been weak and exploited, were an aberration. China will have returned to the center of the global stage, to its proper role as the Middle Kingdom. And it will have been the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that achieved this.
    • In global opinion. Too many Americans dismiss American exceptionalism, equating it with jingoism. Yet, the United States is exceptional—consider how many people risk their lives to emigrate here. If China is able to put a man on the moon while the United States is unable to replicate its past achievement, we can assuage ourselves with the argument that “we did it decades ago,” but that may not be the perception abroad. For many, it may well suggest that the United States is indeed in decline, that it is no longer in a position to lead—and conversely, that China is.
    • In the United States. Some believe in leadership from behind, or even that the United States, with its flaws and weaknesses, is not really suited for leadership. But for most Americans, the United States remains special, and the achievement of placing a man on the moon embodied that exceptionalism. How often have we heard the phrase, “We put a man on the moon,” in response to challenges ranging from curing AIDS to fighting (and winning) the Cold War? The implication is clear—the United States can do anything it sets its mind to it. How will this determination be affected when China lands on the moon, if the United States is unable to respond? What will be the impact on American politics, and will the President at the time be seen as the one who “lost” the moon?

    If the United States is not in a position to compete with the People’s Republic of China, it will be a rather different world the morning after China plants its flag in the lunar soil.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Farewell, Atlantis: China Takes Up the Torch of Manned Space Flight

    1. egw says:

      This makes be literary sick to my stomach. This was one of Americans source of pride & I feel needed for research, also. For Obama to shut this down was one of major mistakes. He said we could send Astronauts by Russia, which is even more insulting. Now that China wants to take up where we left off that gives them all of the hard work our Space Research that we have done. It is just one kick in the teeth after another. I believe he wanted the funds given to NASA to go to some of his other unnecessary projects like Global Warming which is nothing but Sun Spots which were causing this. All the regulations & training & feeling people heads with lies is only to make Gore & those they are invested in it. It would have been nice if he would have gone through Congress before closing NASA up.

      • Brad says:

        Obama hardly shut it down. The program was already on its death bed. Bush didn't help. Work needed to start decades before Obama on the next launch vehicle.

        He is last person to blame for this. Besides, he's lousy enough that there are plenty of other things to blame hiim for.

      • T.Gordon says:

        NASA is important but to say Obama is putting money into "unnecessary projects" is rediculous. He has allocated funds toward education, healthcare, the military, etc and these are no where near unnecessary. Global Warming hasn't even been addressed more intensely than those.

    2. Bobbie says:

      it is very sad that we have a president who just says "no more." the president doesn't believe in American achievements as his lifestyle shows and his actions of disrespect towards it are clear.

      Getting China all set up, since America has been sold behind the backs of the American people.

      • T.Gordon says:

        what lifestyle and "actions of disrespect" are you even reffering to?? Compared to past presidents Obama has a pretty spotless record.

    3. ZackyD says:

      We need a new space program. The shuttles are out dated vehicles. Its unfortunate we did not have a successor lined up for a timely transition, but that is where we are right now. It should not be insulting that we are working with other countries in the effort to explore space. if there is a field were nationalities can become more transparent.. the exploration of space would be it. Keep up the support and we will eventually be picking up our share of manned transport. Its around the corner weather it is privatized or not.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×