• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Natural Gas: Boom or Bust? All Signs Point to Boom

    According to many experts, the United States stands to be the Saudi Arabia of natural gas production. Last month, the New York Times reported otherwise, questioning the economics of shale gas extraction and overstating the amount of gas available in the vast formation in the United States.

    The story included links to hundreds of e-mails from some independent energy executives and state geologists calling shale gas a Ponzi scheme and inducing fears of another Enron-like scandal or a subprime mortgage crisis. Yesterday, the Energy Information Administration’s Howard Gruenspecht testified Tuesday before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee defending the federal government’s estimates. Gruenspecht said:

    I believe EIA is doing a solid job of effectively tracking the emergence of shale gas in the U.S. energy system and thoughtfully reflecting that in our projections. We’re very comfortable with where we are. We’ve seen nothing in the New York Times report that would cause us to change our view.

    Gruenspecht wasn’t the only one to criticize the report. Energy in Depth, which represents America’s natural gas and oil producers, thoroughly takes the Times piece to task, labeling it the newspaper’s “‘Dewey-Defeats-Truman’ Moment on Shale.” In fact, at the same hearing yesterday, Ernest Moniz from MIT defended his team’s study that had promising predictions for shale gas production that used data from government agencies and other independent data sources. Moniz calls shale gas production a “game-changer,” and the MIT study projects that the United States has 92 years’ worth of natural gas at current consumption rates.

    Natural gas in the United States is an important source of energy, and increasing production can help meet rising energy demand, increase jobs, and drive economic growth. Several states have already tremendously benefited from increased production. Professor Timothy J. Considine estimates that the total value added in gross regional production to Pennsylvania and West Virginia from production in the Marcellus shale formation was $4.8 billion, and the production generated over 57,000 jobs in 2009 alone. A recent study from the Manhattan Institute approximates that ending New York’s moratorium on hydraulic fracturing would create up to 18,000 jobs in the Southern Tier and western New York and increase economic activity by $11.4 billion.

    In either case (an abundance of shale gas or no shale gas in the United States), there is no reason for policymakers to unreasonably increase regulations that make it difficult or impossible for investors and energy companies to pursue natural gas production. Nor is having an abundance of natural gas a reason to subsidize the production of it. Natural gas policy should focus on increasing access and opening markets, not unreasonably increasing regulations. This would allow natural gas production to succeed or fail on its own.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Natural Gas: Boom or Bust? All Signs Point to Boom

    1. pgillenw says:

      We do realize that the pillage of America's resources means that corporations will reap the benefits, the American consumer will continue to pay a high cost both for fuel and damage to other natural resources, like water, while these nefarious corporations ship our bounty oversees to fuel manufacturing in cheap labor markets,

      • Scott says:

        I have to assume, based on that comment, that you are "off the grid" and that you walk or ride a bicycle everywhere you need to go. Obviously, you have some access to electricity and internet, hence your post. That fact also takes some credibility away from your comment. Why all the negativity?

    2. Don Kilby says:

      The most inportant thing is not to be dependent on those who hate each and every one of us.

    3. Pingback: Oil and Gas News | Lousiana Oil and Gas Association

    4. mtch says:

      Gas can be a bridge to future energy technologies, but the Greenies detest this idea. They somehow think that the world will lose interest in green energy sources, if Nat Gas production and use, is allowed to flourish.

    5. Pingback: Radical Environmentalists' Campaign Against Economic Freedom

    6. John says:

      During the last boom about 7 years ago leased my property for 3 yrs for $375 k. They did not drill gas price dropped. I am hoping it will come back.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×