• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Religion and the Budget: The Prudence of Principled Dialogue

    In an article for a Catholic Web site, Representative Paul Ryan (R–WI) has again clarified the role he thinks faith and social doctrine should play in creating public policies.

    Ryan states that, in his role as a policymaker, he takes seriously the teachings of his church, especially the call to care for the poor. But he doesn’t equate this moral norm with increasing the size of the welfare state.

    Social teaching is not the monopoly of one political party, nor is it a moral command that confuses the preferential option for the poor with a preferential option for bigger government.

    According to Ryan, “there’s a right way and wrong way to understand” Catholic social doctrine and to bring it to bear in the political arena. As he writes:

    Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, indicated the right way in his gracious letter to me: “[T]he Church makes an essential contribution to society when she raises up moral principles to help guide and inform decisions about public policy in a compelling way.”…

    Policymakers apply timeless principles to policies that are necessarily limited by changing circumstances. The judgments of equally well-intentioned citizens may differ. Usually, there isn’t just one morally valid policy. Instead, there are better and worse ones calling for respectful dialogue and thoughtful judgment. The moral principles are dogmatic; the political responses are prudential.

    This guidance holds for many public policy questions. Recently, religious voices have focused particular attention on the House Budget Committee’s proposed federal budget for FY 2012, entitled The Path to Prosperity. (For more on this, see recent Heritage posts and commentary.) When it comes to evaluating such policies, Ryan, the committee’s chairman, asserts that

    Catholic social thought’s paramount interest is the moral character of society, which takes primacy over dollars and cents. What kind of people do Americans want to be?

    Faith communities can help Americans and their political representatives wrestle with this fundamental question. Religious leaders are perhaps most helpful in this effort when they clarify important moral concepts and implications involved in budgetary proposals while acknowledging that people of good will can differ on the nuts and bolts of complex policy matters.

    Both those who agree and disagree with the details of Ryan’s proposed budget should heed his insights about and example of helpful church–state dialogue.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Religion and the Budget: The Prudence of Principled Dialogue

    1. Steve H says:

      Matthew 25:40 – what you did to the least of your brothers, you did to me.

      Would be nice if the far right paid attention to the whole bible – the vast majority abotu helping those in need and not being materialistic – instead of the line or two that is against homosexuality.

      The conservative hypocrisy has no end.

      • Bobbie says:

        Would be nice if you accept the understanding of the bible! What does hypocrisy have to do with opposition towards homosexuality? If gays are the least of Jesus brothers it is up to others to help them realize their acts of homosexuality are despised and unacceptable by God! They have been helped but continue their defiant ways. Sin is begging to be accepted in contrast of God's Will! No thanks! That's you, not conservatives. Keep your privacy to yourself, you will be judged exploiting Jesus or not.

    2. Lisa Gannon says:

      This is a great insight Ryan. In the Catholic Church, there needs to be ever more elucidation of the need for fiscal responsibility and invocation of the principle of subsidiarity in answering the needs of the poor and all Americans. Deacon Dan's site also comments on Catholic Social teaching in support of Ryan's plan at http://www.catholicurrent.com.

    3. zbigniewmazurak says:

      Irrelevant. Both Rep. Ryan and the Catholic Church support a bloated Big Government that vastly exceeds its Constitutional limits. I'm PROUD that I am NOT a Catholic.

    4. Russell Hamner says:

      "Social teaching is not the monopoly of one political party, nor is it a moral command that confuses the preferential option for the poor with a preferential option for bigger government."

      So you know that Care for the poor is a religious execise and still condone Welfare state?

      Ever haer of the first amendment bannig government sponsered Religion Wake Up you having a nightmare and it is destroyng oor country.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.